User comments on ISPs
  >> Be Un Limited


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User nredwood
(knowledge is power) Wed 03-Feb-10 17:09:21
Print Post

Interleaved vs fastpath test


[link to this post]
 
My line is fairly noisy, so in past times I've struggled with gaming mode enabled - line was unstable and kept dropping down to ADSL2 modulation

I haven't tried since BT replaced my dropwire and the line has become alot more stable, so though I would give it a go

Just changed over and here are the stats before and after - now to see if it remains stable

Interleaved

Uptime: 0 days, 1:28:26
Modulation: G.992.5 Annex A
Bandwidth (Up/Down) [kbps/kbps]: 1,300 / 8,302
Data Transferred (Sent/Received) [MB/MB]: 49.52 / 10.12
Output Power (Up/Down) [dBm]: 12.0 / 18.0
Line Attenuation (Up/Down) [dB]: 18.0 / 36.0
SN Margin (Up/Down) [dB]: 6.5 / 6.5
Vendor ID (Local/Remote): TMMB / µ
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote): 4 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote): 24 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Link (Remote): 0
Error Seconds (Local/Remote): 7,379 / 0
FEC Errors (Up/Down): 0 / 42,345
CRC Errors (Up/Down): 11,830 / 230
HEC Errors (Up/Down): 6,793 / 208

Fastpath

Uptime: 0 days, 0:02:05
Modulation: G.992.5 Annex A
Bandwidth (Up/Down) [kbps/kbps]: 1,313 / 8,860
Data Transferred (Sent/Received) [MB/KB]: 0.97 / 221.00
Output Power (Up/Down) [dBm]: 12.0 / 18.0
Line Attenuation (Up/Down) [dB]: 18.0 / 36.0
SN Margin (Up/Down) [dB]: 6.5 / 6.5
Vendor ID (Local/Remote): TMMB / µ
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote): 8 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote): 25 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Link (Remote): 0
Error Seconds (Local/Remote): 7,410 / 0
FEC Errors (Up/Down): 0 / 0
CRC Errors (Up/Down): 0 / 5
HEC Errors (Up/Down): 0 / 4


C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>ping www.bbc.co.uk

Pinging www.bbc.net.uk [212.58.253.67] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.58.253.67: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.253.67: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.253.67: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.253.67: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=122

Ping statistics for 212.58.253.67:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 8ms, Maximum = 8ms, Average = 8ms

Be* Unlimited
Standard User BatBoy
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Wed 03-Feb-10 18:17:19
Print Post

Re: Interleaved vs fastpath test


[re: nredwood] [link to this post]
 
Ooo look, your bandwidth increases when you're on Fastpath smile

Good luck.
Standard User nredwood
(knowledge is power) Wed 03-Feb-10 18:48:52
Print Post

Re: Interleaved vs fastpath test


[re: BatBoy] [link to this post]
 
So it does (bandwidth increases on fastpath that is) laugh

And look, it's increased even more

Uptime: 0 days, 1:16:31
Modulation: G.992.5 Annex A
Bandwidth (Up/Down) [kbps/kbps]: 1,321 / 8,899
Data Transferred (Sent/Received) [MB/MB]: 1.25 / 1.67
Output Power (Up/Down) [dBm]: 12.0 / 18.5
Line Attenuation (Up/Down) [dB]: 18.0 / 36.0
SN Margin (Up/Down) [dB]: 6.0 / 6.5
Vendor ID (Local/Remote): TMMB / µ
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Link (Remote): 0
Error Seconds (Local/Remote): 212 / 0
FEC Errors (Up/Down): 0 / 0
CRC Errors (Up/Down): 76 / 260
HEC Errors (Up/Down): 85 / 149

Be* Unlimited

Edited by nredwood (Wed 03-Feb-10 18:49:52)


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User BatBoy
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Wed 03-Feb-10 18:54:30
Print Post

Re: Interleaved vs fastpath test


[re: nredwood] [link to this post]
 
For that attenuation, I'd expect a sync of 13466 smile
Standard User nredwood
(knowledge is power) Wed 03-Feb-10 19:02:58
Print Post

Re: Interleaved vs fastpath test


[re: BatBoy] [link to this post]
 
So would I, but sadly something is preventing that from happening frown

Be* Unlimited
Standard User BatBoy
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Wed 03-Feb-10 19:13:45
Print Post

Re: Interleaved vs fastpath test


[re: nredwood] [link to this post]
 
What does the bitloading look like on e.g. the latest Routerstats?
Standard User nredwood
(knowledge is power) Wed 03-Feb-10 19:39:22
Print Post

Re: Interleaved vs fastpath test


[re: BatBoy] [link to this post]
 
http://i47.tinypic.com/aypmjl.jpg

Be* Unlimited
Standard User BatBoy
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Wed 03-Feb-10 20:20:11
Print Post

Re: Interleaved vs fastpath test


[re: nredwood] [link to this post]
 
Eek, lots of gaps there. Wonder what's causing it.....
Have you got any RFI filters on there?
Standard User nredwood
(knowledge is power) Wed 03-Feb-10 20:36:27
Print Post

Re: Interleaved vs fastpath test


[re: BatBoy] [link to this post]
 
No RF filters
Plugged into master socket - not much difference in test socket
Ring wire removed
Internal wiring checked by BT to be fine
NTE5 replaced
Dropwire replaced
Similar results with other routers - i.e 2Wire & DG834GT
Different filters tried
Different RJ11's tried
Ferrites tried in different configurations

At about 5pm when I resynced, DMT was showing 10 gaps - now up to 18 gaps mostly corresponding with MW radio stations

Be* Unlimited
Standard User BatBoy
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Wed 03-Feb-10 20:41:29
Print Post

Re: Interleaved vs fastpath test


[re: nredwood] [link to this post]
 
Do your neighbours have similar problems?
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to