EE seem to think that "Far End errors are way to high" I don't know if they're acceptable or not to be honest. They said "We don't concentrate on Near End Errors, only Far End."
It's the Near End errors that are high; the Far End ones are minuscule by comparison, often 0. The LoS are always on Near End.
It's the Near End errors that are important; they relate to Downstream.
They are talking rubbish and must have mixed up their ends, anus about face
EDIT: Or are viewing it from the exchange end.
They seem to think that they are "Ramming too much speed down my line" and this is causing the Errors.
Which contradicts "Far End".
1999: Freeserve 48K Dial-Up => 2005: Wanadoo 1 Meg BB => 2007: Orange 2 Meg BB => 2008: Orange 8 Meg LLU => 2010: Orange 16 Meg LLU => 2011: Orange 20 Meg WBC
Edited by XRaySpeX (Fri 05-Apr-13 23:11:53)