Technical Discussion
  >> Hardware Issues


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


  Print Thread
Standard User zyborg47
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Thu 16-Mar-17 17:19:26
Print Post

Ryzen 5


[link to this post]
 
So a new cheaper Ryzen is coming out in April, called the Ryzen 5, looks interesting, but now got me thinking of either going for the more expensive 7, or go for the cheaper 5, what ever I get it will certainly be better than what I have got.

Microsoft is blocking updates for windows 7 and 8 on the newer processors, which is to be honest out of order, if people ant to run 7 or 8 on these CPU's then they should be allowed to. i can understand Ms not supporting them, but to block the updates, that is just typ;icle of Ms throwing their toys out of the pram if they can not get their way.

Adrian

Desktop machine now powered by windows 8.1 pro 64bit, no dreaded metro, laptop by Linux

Plusnet FTTC
Standard User Alnath
(fountain of knowledge) Thu 20-Apr-17 19:07:15
Print Post

Re: Ryzen 5


[re: zyborg47] [link to this post]
 
I've got a Ryzen 5 1600 and i am really, really impressed, it goes like the clappers.
Standard User zyborg47
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Thu 20-Apr-17 20:39:45
Print Post

Re: Ryzen 5


[re: Alnath] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Alnath:
I've got a Ryzen 5 1600 and i am really, really impressed, it goes like the clappers.


I have heard good things about it, what memory are you using?

i must admit I am still thinking of going for the R7 1700x,

Adrian

Desktop machine now powered by windows 8.1 pro 64bit, no dreaded metro, laptop by Linux

Plusnet FTTC


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User Alnath
(fountain of knowledge) Fri 21-Apr-17 11:05:34
Print Post

Re: Ryzen 5


[re: zyborg47] [link to this post]
 
I was nervous about it not booting so i played it safe and went for a single 8GB stick of Crucial DDR 4 2400. I figured it was going to feel a millions time faster than what i had so better safe than sorry, i didnt even go for single rank or a kit to run in dual channel mode lol

I can be a bit more adventuous when the BIOS updates have slowed down and things settle.
Standard User micksharpe
(legend) Fri 21-Apr-17 17:19:23
Print Post

Re: Ryzen 5


[re: Alnath] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Alnath:
I can be a bit more adventurous when the BIOS updates have slowed down and things settle.
I was going to ask about stability, but now I don't think I need to. I haven't had to do a BIOS update since I moved from AMD to Intel. Before that, I was doing them all the time, and not because it was a hobby. Some things never change, apparently.
Standard User zyborg47
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Fri 21-Apr-17 17:27:11
Print Post

Re: Ryzen 5


[re: Alnath] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Alnath:
I was nervous about it not booting so i played it safe and went for a single 8GB stick of Crucial DDR 4 2400. I figured it was going to feel a millions time faster than what i had so better safe than sorry, i didnt even go for single rank or a kit to run in dual channel mode lol

I can be a bit more adventuous when the BIOS updates have slowed down and things settle.



i am looking at getting a couple of Corsair Vengeance LPX of 8GB each at 3200Mhz, I have no idea if they are single rank or not, how do you tell if it is not in the specs?

Getting a couple of sticks instead of populating all four, means I can stick more in at some other point, not that I seem myself doing that.

Adrian

Desktop machine now powered by windows 8.1 pro 64bit, no dreaded metro, laptop by Linux

Plusnet FTTC
Standard User Alnath
(fountain of knowledge) Sat 22-Apr-17 10:32:50
Print Post

Re: Ryzen 5


[re: zyborg47] [link to this post]
 
To be honest with you with just a single stick of PC2400 the cinebench scores on the 1600 are identical to the cinebench scores on the 1600x with presumably better RAM, the test i have seen they got 1136 and mine got 1129
Standard User Alnath
(fountain of knowledge) Sat 22-Apr-17 10:46:04
Print Post

Re: Ryzen 5


[re: micksharpe] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by micksharpe:
In reply to a post by Alnath:
I can be a bit more adventurous when the BIOS updates have slowed down and things settle.
I was going to ask about stability, but now I don't think I need to. I haven't had to do a BIOS update since I moved from AMD to Intel. Before that, I was doing them all the time, and not because it was a hobby. Some things never change, apparently.


I also moved from AMD to Intel and after 8 years i'm back with AMD.

When i set up my Intel stuff i remember having to do a couple of BIOS updates but after moving from Windows XP to Windows 7 i never had to do anything else the BIOS releases had stopped and as i went through subsequent versions of Windows i never had to do clean installs or owt so having to start again was a bit of a shock.

When i set this up i had the BIOS ready, i thought if that goes belly up i can do it before i have finished not afterwards. Anyway everything is installed and its fine, it is no less stable than my Intel parts were, the only thing i have done is set the fan profiles myself because the front case fan was running too loud.
  Print Thread

Jump to