User comments on ISPs
  >> PlusNet plc


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


These posts have been archived and can no longer be replied to or modified.
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | [3] | 4 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User smithg
(member) Sun 16-Dec-07 18:53:45
Print Post

Re: Single port router


[re: wingco1] [link to this post]
 
Well if you are being strictly accurate again then as ethernet predates the PC it certainly was not intended for the PC. (Ethernet was developed by Xerox in the 70s and 10Mb/s ethernet was first standardised in 1980 - the PC first appeared in 1981).

Also as USB2 is capable of 480Mb/s then it can outstrip 100Mb/s ethernet. Even USB1.1 at 12Mb/s outstrips the ADSL speed of 8Mb/s, hence even if the 2 PCs are using the two ports of the single port router to share an internet connection then USB is quite sufficent, though if only USB1.1 it might not be ideal to use to transfer large files between 2 PCs.

However this is all getting a bit pedantic again - this single port router will allow two PCs to share an internet connection and the addition of a switch will allow you to connect many PCs. A simple modem won't allow you to do that. The description is accurate - it may not lead to a network you would be happy with - but it is accurate.

Graham Smith
Broadband Your Way Option 3
Powered by FreeOnline (a PlusNet company)

Edited by smithg (Sun 16-Dec-07 18:54:34)

Standard User wingco1
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Sun 16-Dec-07 19:40:45
Print Post

Re: Single port router


[re: smithg] [link to this post]
 
In reply to:

The description is accurate - it may not lead to a network you would be happy with - but it is accurate.



So why not advertise it as a two port router???

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power."
Abraham Lincoln
16th president of US (1809 - 1865)
Standard User smithg
(member) Sun 16-Dec-07 20:37:29
Print Post

Re: Single port router


[re: wingco1] [link to this post]
 
Because they didn't! As I tried to describe any title is fairly inaccurate. Maybe 'single ethernet port router' would be closer - but far from complete. Personally I think single and dual port router would both be inaccurate and are both somewhat misleading. However single port router is close enough for most people - if you are interested you have to look at a more detailed description to understand what it really does - many people aren't that interested!

Graham Smith
Broadband Your Way Option 3
Powered by FreeOnline (a PlusNet company)


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User wingco1
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Sun 16-Dec-07 20:46:43
Print Post

Re: Single port router


[re: smithg] [link to this post]
 
Not really that bothered Graham. It just struck me that the claim of a "single port" router and a wired LAN was misleading. However I suppose two computers connected via the router is a wired LAN, even though it's not made clear one connection is via USB.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power."
Abraham Lincoln
16th president of US (1809 - 1865)
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 17-Dec-07 09:00:22
Print Post

Re: Single port router


[re: wingco1] [link to this post]
 
Tbh, I'm with Wingco on this one.

Sure, it is technically possible to create a home network, either by adding a switch or by connecting one computer by ethernet and one by usb. however, your average home user probably won't know how to go about setting up a switch, nor will they have two computers close enough to take advantage of the dual connectivity without going out to buy additional ethernet wiring.
Standard User lorisarvendu
(experienced) Mon 17-Dec-07 09:43:09
Print Post

Re: Single port router


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to:

Tbh, I'm with Wingco on this one.

Sure, it is technically possible to create a home network, either by adding a switch or by connecting one computer by ethernet and one by usb. however, your average home user probably won't know how to go about setting up a switch, nor will they have two computers close enough to take advantage of the dual connectivity without going out to buy additional ethernet wiring.




Slightly OT, but I'm looking with interest at this product. Would appear to solve the problem of computers in separate rooms, without investing in either wiring or wireless.

http://www.solwise.co.uk/net-powerline-pl-85pe.htm

I might pop over to one of the hardware forums and see if anyone is using these.
Moderator Sadoldman
(moderator) Mon 17-Dec-07 10:06:31
Print Post

Re: Single port router


[re: lorisarvendu] [link to this post]
 

>I might pop over to one of the hardware forums and see if anyone is using these.

Not sure if you have seen the review.

The reports on here seem to indicate that people find them good. Eliminates the vagaries of wireless and the fact that you can move them room to room is a handy feature.

Sadoldman

Just a tad sad..a wee bit old...

[email protected]
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband moderator but it does not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 17-Dec-07 11:11:38
Print Post

Re: Single port router


[re: Sadoldman] [link to this post]
 
Yup, I've only seen good feedback on that bit of hardware.
Standard User TheHorseman
(fountain of knowledge) Mon 17-Dec-07 13:36:57
Print Post

Re: Single port router


[re: lorisarvendu] [link to this post]
 
Use the Devolo ones myself, no problems at all.

Be* Unlimited
Far too many computers, 1 Ducati M900, 1 Wife, 3 Cats and 1 horse
+++ Out of Cheese Error. Redo From Start +++
Standard User undergroover
(newbie) Sat 22-Dec-07 07:56:06
Print Post

Re: Single port router


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Make sure you setup the security on them as well.

I've got 5 of them dotted around the house and didn't secure them (yes, I know....)

Am on a new build estate that's got fairly rubbish internal phone wiring, so only really the master socket gets a decent DSL signal, hence using PowerLine adaptors to relay the router connection to the rest of the kit in the house.

Anyhoo, as the neighbours all have pretty much the same problem, they've all gone down the same route and used PowerLine adaptors as well. Now the good thing (or bad thing really) about these bits of kit is that the signal's strong and resilient enough to carry not only around the house, but also pass through my electricity meter, out into the street and into my nearest neighbour's house!

Worked reasonably well enough to do some direct file transfers for testing and we were both able to browse the other's networked storage fine once given an access acount. All tied down now though, so job done.

I'd still recommend them without hesitation though.
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | [3] | 4 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to