Nope.
If you look at the stats from a different router that you posted at 12:03, and appear to be from 14 December, the Loop Loss, which is another name for Attenuation, and the noise margins, both look sensible, and correspond closely to ones from the Linksys if the attenuation and noise margin data from the linksys are swapped to each others description. Oh - just realised, on the Linksys the Up/Down headings are also obviously reversed, though correct for the power figures.
In particular, we expect the upstream attenuation to be about half the downstream, and re the noise margin the 6.45dB downstream figure straight after a reconnection is a highly likely reading and the ones reported are impossible - the system cannot assign such margins. The downstream rate is also consistent with that 6.45dB margin on a longish line (50db-ish attenuation), but is still low.
How recent is the LInksys firmware/driver? I had a WAG54GS a few years ago and don't remember this problem. Ah - Aug 2008. Is there an update available?
Another noticeable effect is that it is reporting ADSL2, whereas your Plusnet setting is almost certainly ADSL2+. Or have you forced it?
The 52.5dB loop loss falling to 50dB is consistent with that change, but the earlier 48.5dB looks strange. In particular the attenuation on any particular router should not change by more than 0.5dB, ever. Though different makes can calculate it differently, (it is an average of the individual attenuations at each frequency and it seems different manufacturers use different criterea for including particular ones), which is something I haven't considered above.
I don't think I would be using the Linksys if I had others available. Is there a particular reason for it?
My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk
My domains,website and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Internet connection - IDNet Home Starter Fibre.
Live BQM.
"Where talent is a dwarf, self-esteem is a giant." - Jean-Antoine Petit-Senn.