User comments on ISPs
  >> PlusNet plc


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | [9] | 10 | 11 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 10-Jan-16 14:30:28
Print Post

Re: Plusnet stuck in 20th Century


[re: Oliver341] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Oliver341:
In reply to a post by RobertoS:
Are you suggesting that these IP addresses are/were BT Global Services USA branch owned?

I was under the impression they were obtained from Infonet, a Californian company. And yes, it's registered with ARIN not RIPE:

https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-146-200-0-0-1/pf...
So why haven't BT updated the registration details with ARIN?
Standard User Oliver341
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Sun 10-Jan-16 14:35:11
Print Post

Re: Plusnet stuck in 20th Century


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by BatBoy:
So why haven't BT updated the registration details with ARIN?

Good question, especially as Bob Pullen admitted the whois data is a "mish-mash" in August 2014.

Oliver.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 10-Jan-16 14:41:23
Print Post

Re: Plusnet stuck in 20th Century


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Updated it to what?

Infonet Services Corporation is still an active/legal company and the owner of the block of addresses.

I don't believe the block can be transferred between RIRs.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 10-Jan-16 14:42:02
Print Post

Re: Plusnet stuck in 20th Century


[re: Oliver341] [link to this post]
 
You have to wonder what they do all day instead of sorting out the network.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 10-Jan-16 14:43:25
Print Post

Re: Plusnet stuck in 20th Century


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by AndyHCZ:
Updated it to what?

Infonet Services Corporation is still an active/legal company and the owner of the block of addresses.

I don't believe the block can be transferred between RIRs.
I thought the block is being used by Plusnet? Updating it to say Plusnet would be the obvious choice.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 10-Jan-16 14:47:28
Print Post

Re: Plusnet stuck in 20th Century


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
This is what it says already. That fact that ownership is listed as Infonet, is largely irrelevant.

The problem is getting geolocation services to update their databases with the correct information from what is listed on ARIN.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 10-Jan-16 14:50:59
Print Post

Re: Plusnet stuck in 20th Century


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by AndyHCZ:
This is what it says already. That fact that ownership is listed as Infonet, is largely irrelevant.
The name is PLUSNET1 but this could be anything and is irrelevant.

The problem is that the organization is shown as INFONET Services Corporation (INFO).

Edited by deleted (Sun 10-Jan-16 15:36:43)

Standard User Oliver341
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Sun 10-Jan-16 14:51:30
Print Post

Re: Plusnet stuck in 20th Century


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Despite what Plusnet might say, I doubt having "Country: US" in the IP whois is helpful for geo-location issues.

Oliver.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 10-Jan-16 14:54:43
Print Post

Re: Plusnet stuck in 20th Century *DELETED*


[re: Oliver341] [link to this post]
 
Post deleted by BatBoy
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 10-Jan-16 14:58:50
Print Post

Re: Plusnet stuck in 20th Century


[re: Oliver341] [link to this post]
 
Not correct - the Direct Assignment and allocation details are what geolocation services use.

In most examples given by Bob Pullen, websites have used out of date geolocation databases and once updated, issues have been resolved.
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | [9] | 10 | 11 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to