Sagecom 2704N.

I understand Plusnet are still issuing the Sagecom 2704N.and not the hub 1 as I previously was led to believe. Anyone know if this does NAT loopback please?

Why do you need NAT loopback?

All explained in another thread.

I'll search for you, if you can't find it.

Given that (including 31 July) you have started eight threads, only one of which has NAT loopback in its Subject, and only asks if a particular router does it, and doesn't say you want it, that seems a little unfair .

You beat me to it.

Can't find a reason. I'm assuming the OP has a home server of some sort.

I give up!

I'm attacked for asking the same question about different routers and diffierent ISPs, but when I throw the whole cross post thing back at the poster, you say it is unfair?

https://forums.thinkbroadband.com/general/t/4625592-...

I'm all for following "rules" and being reasonable, but it works both ways.

I don't want to upset by "cross posting"! :-

https://forums.thinkbroadband.com/general/t/4625592-...

In reply to a post by hk11:

I understand Plusnet are still issuing the Sagecom 2704N.and not the hub 1 as I previously was led to believe. Anyone know if this does NAT loopback please?

Hub1 is for FTTC/VDSL services - Sagemcom is for ADSL services.

They are both bargain basement rubbish and I suspect anyone whom wants more advanced services such as NAT loopback, has replaced with better.

I didn't realise that NAT loopback was classed as an "advanced service"?

Am I to assume your answer to my question is no?

I'm all for following "rules" and being reasonable, but it works both ways.

It's interesting that you have not once answered any of the various questions you have been asked in your multiple recent threads. For example despite repeated request by various posters your refused to say what device, OS and browser you were using when you alone had problems accessing the PlusNet site. Repeated questions answered in part by Mr Saffron whilst you continued to sit on your hands and play dumb.

In reply to a post by hk11:

I didn't realise that NAT loopback was classed as an "advanced service"?

No it's not an advanced service, it's a NAT fudge which can be solved in other ways.

Are you a retired comedian?

You are replying to the wrong person.

In reply to a post by jchamier:

anyone whom wants more advanced services such as NAT loopback

Edited by hk11 (Wed 26-Aug-20 19:49:52)

In reply to a post by hk11:

You are replying to the wrong person.

It seems like you could benefit from the advice that it's a "NAT fudge which can be solved in other ways" though.

Fair comment.

Have you looked at the previous thread?

In reply to a post by hk11:

I give up!

I'm attacked for asking the same question about different routers and diffierent ISPs, but when I throw the whole cross post thing back at the poster, you say it is unfair?

https://forums.thinkbroadband.com/general/t/4625592-...

I'm all for following "rules" and being reasonable, but it works both ways.

Errrrr No!

In reply to a post by hk11:

All explained in another thread.

I'll search for you, if you can't find it.

Given the eight threads, containing over 70 posts by yourself excluding this thread, never mind all the replies by those trying to help you, with you being the only person with any idea of where you explained why you want it, the ethical thing to do would be to provide a link to the location.

Anything else, such as you posted, comes across as deliberate rudeness.

I am sorry you think I am being rude, but I am cheesed off that I am being attacked for cross posting when I am not.

Surely posting that which I have already posted *is* cross posting?

Edited by hk11 (Wed 26-Aug-20 20:07:46)

Seems I already replied there. http://192.168.1.30/ or https://192.168.1.30/ with whatever the IP address of the webcam is should work, assuming it listens on a standard port.

I usually reply. Apologies, if I didn't.

I think there were issues due to working with iOS?

In reply to a post by hk11:

I think there were issues due to working with iOS?

A browser in iOS should work like any other.

In reply to a post by hk11:

I am sorry you think I am being rude, but I am cheesed off that I am being attacked for cross posting when I am not.

Surely posting that which I have already posted *is* cross posting?

Posting a link to where you have previously given the requested information is not cross-posting. Cross posting is starting two (near or) identical posts, potentially causing two separate sets of replies. Thereby wasting people's time, particularly if the poster's query has been solved in one of the threads.

You have been here long enough to know that.

In reply to a post by hk11:

I don't want to upset by "cross posting"! :-

https://forums.thinkbroadband.com/general/t/4625592-...

Would be helpful if you avoided cross posting

I'm sorry but there's only one idiot posting to these threads. I'll leave it to you to work out who that might be.

I wasn't aware I was.

Are you looking for hyphens, seb?

I saw a great example of the need for them in Sainsbury's today, with the lack of it emphasised by the layout. (It was in capitals so I shall write it likewise).

ORGANIC
OR GLUTEN
FREE TREATS

Over a display of presumably "healthy" fattening foods. I didn't look that close, but a typical chocolate bar layout.

Maybe seb means "cross" as in "annoyed" .

In reply to a post by RobertoS:

Are you looking for hyphens, seb?

Nope.. otherwise there wouldn't be anything to complain about

You should really consider coming out of retirement.

I know what it is, but others don't seem to.

At the end of the day I was asking a simple question and just seemed to have stired up the mud at the bottom of the pind!

Must have been another post.

In reply to a post by RobertoS:

Are you looking for hyphens, seb?

Surely he'd just put "-" in the search engine, if he were?

You come across as a sad individual who hates answering questions yet expects people to respond to his oft repeated question. I've never met you and you may be an extremely likable individual, regrettably that's not the image you portray here.

On second thoughts, perhaps it would be better for everyone if you remain retired.

Closing thread as it is being pulled down into the gutter with barbs thrown back and forth