FTTC enabled but not on my cab yet MYKNO

Hi Can anyone please supply any information
I am on the Knottingley Exchange MYKNO postcode WF11 0JZ no sign of any work done on the nearest cab ( number 2 ) to me which is 400 yards away And BT checker says nothing new.
Most of knottingley is 90% done also another street near by with new homes built around 4 years ago shows nothing on the BT checker also postcode is WF11 0LE


Thanks
David

Edited by dparr59 (Wed 01-Feb-12 02:15:24)

Unfortunately the December 2011 document says "No" to the postcode WF11 0LE --

MYKNO,KNOTTINGLEY,WF110LE,{MYKNO}{P2},0,100%,,,,

What about Postcode WF11 0JZ that i am on

Looked on the December_2012_PCP. can not find and mention of CAB number 2thats near me.
How do i find out if i have a direct line to the telephone Exchange if i am not on that Cab
Also my street was built in 1937

Edited by dparr59 (Wed 01-Feb-12 09:33:33)

Yes, that post code is cab 2. It's in Part 2 of the two csv files. Not on the schedule at all.

"Blanks” = Not part of a phase / untargeted cabinet

What about Postcode WF11 0JZ that i am on

Looked on the December_2012_PCP. can not find and mention of CAB number 2thats near me.
How do i find out if i have a direct line to the telephone Exchange if i am not on that Cab
Also my street was built in 1937

Identical to the above --

MYKNO,KNOTTINGLEY,WF110JZ,{MYKNO}{P2},0,100%,,,,

Thanks for the reply's
I Have the December_2012_PCP.csv but can not see page 2 showimg the postcode's not in use.
Goes from 100 to 500 showing the cabs in use
Where would i get Part 2 of the two csv files
Also what does 6b mean ?


thanks David

Edited by dparr59 (Wed 01-Feb-12 22:05:37)

Post the link to what you are looking at please .

The original spreadsheet appears to have been split into two, as it had too many rows. CSVs were created from those, that many of us have downloaded and imported into Excel.

Some kind soul created a multi-page single fusion document, and maybe they didn't include the exchange-only rows. That may be what you have.

Edited by RobertoS (Wed 01-Feb-12 22:08:26)

Here's what i have
https://www.google.com/fusiontables/DataSource?snapi...

thanks

David

Yes, that's the "kind soul" document I referred to.

It looks as though he has omitted lines that have the "blank" info. See the posts from burakkucat showing all the "commas" signifying empty cells, and my earlier post with the "Blank = ....", which is from the descriptive texts at the beginning of the raw csvs.

The document header reads --

NGA
Whilst BT has endeavoured to ensure accuracy of the information contained in this document it cannot be guaranteed. BT cannot accept liability for any inaccuracies contained within this document.
Caveat; This list is only a current indication of cabinet to post code service correlation and may be subject to change in the longer term if re-routing of network connections is required at any time
Issue Version 1.0 (15th December 2011) Part One
PLEASE NOTE: Postcodes which map to Exchange Only Lines are not shown in this report.
Please do not forward

Openreach reserves the right to modify delivery criteria and delivery dates.

© British Telecommunications plc 2011

The ten fields, for each record, are as follows --

(1) SAU_ID
(2) Name
(3) Postcode
(4) SAU_NODE_ID
(5) Exchange Only Flag
(6) Percent Lines
(7) Uplift
(8) Phase
(9) Deployed
(10) FTTC or FTTP

The "6b" is the phase of a particular deployment.

[Edit: Ten fields per record, not nine.]

Edited by burakkucat (Wed 01-Feb-12 22:44:32)