|
|
Hi Can anyone please supply any information
I am on the Knottingley Exchange MYKNO postcode WF11 0JZ no sign of any work done on the nearest cab ( number 2 ) to me which is 400 yards away And BT checker says nothing new.
Most of knottingley is 90% done also another street near by with new homes built around 4 years ago shows nothing on the BT checker also postcode is WF11 0LE
Thanks
David
Edited by deleted (Wed 01-Feb-12 02:15:24)
|
|
|
Unfortunately the December 2011 document says " No" to the postcode WF11 0LE --
MYKNO,KNOTTINGLEY,WF110LE,{MYKNO}{P2},0,100%,,,,
-----------------------------------------------------
100% Linux and, previously, Unix.
|
|
|
What about Postcode WF11 0JZ that i am on
Looked on the December_2012_PCP. can not find and mention of CAB number 2thats near me.
How do i find out if i have a direct line to the telephone Exchange if i am not on that Cab
Also my street was built in 1937
Edited by deleted (Wed 01-Feb-12 09:33:33)
|
|
Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.
|
|
|
Yes, that post code is cab 2. It's in Part 2 of the two csv files. Not on the schedule at all. "Blanks� = Not part of a phase / untargeted cabinet
My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk
My domains,website and mail hosting - Tsohost. Internet connection - IDNet Home Starter Fibre. Live BQM.
"Where talent is a dwarf, self-esteem is a giant." - Jean-Antoine Petit-Senn.
|
|
|
What about Postcode WF11 0JZ that i am on
Looked on the December_2012_PCP. can not find and mention of CAB number 2thats near me.
How do i find out if i have a direct line to the telephone Exchange if i am not on that Cab
Also my street was built in 1937 Identical to the above -- MYKNO,KNOTTINGLEY,WF110JZ,{MYKNO}{P2},0,100%,,,,
-----------------------------------------------------
100% Linux and, previously, Unix.
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply's
I Have the December_2012_PCP.csv but can not see page 2 showimg the postcode's not in use.
Goes from 100 to 500 showing the cabs in use
Where would i get Part 2 of the two csv files
Also what does 6b mean ?
thanks David
Edited by deleted (Wed 01-Feb-12 22:05:37)
|
|
|
Post the link to what you are looking at please  .
The original spreadsheet appears to have been split into two, as it had too many rows. CSVs were created from those, that many of us have downloaded and imported into Excel.
Some kind soul created a multi-page single fusion document, and maybe they didn't include the exchange-only rows. That may be what you have.
My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk
My domains,website and mail hosting - Tsohost. Internet connection - IDNet Home Starter Fibre. Live BQM.
"Where talent is a dwarf, self-esteem is a giant." - Jean-Antoine Petit-Senn.
Edited by RobertoS (Wed 01-Feb-12 22:08:26)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, that's the "kind soul" document I referred to.
It looks as though he has omitted lines that have the "blank" info. See the posts from burakkucat showing all the "commas" signifying empty cells, and my earlier post with the "Blank = ....", which is from the descriptive texts at the beginning of the raw csvs.
My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk
My domains,website and mail hosting - Tsohost. Internet connection - IDNet Home Starter Fibre. Live BQM.
"Where talent is a dwarf, self-esteem is a giant." - Jean-Antoine Petit-Senn.
|
|
|
The document header reads --
NGA
Whilst BT has endeavoured to ensure accuracy of the information contained in this document it cannot be guaranteed. BT cannot accept liability for any inaccuracies contained within this document.
Caveat; This list is only a current indication of cabinet to post code service correlation and may be subject to change in the longer term if re-routing of network connections is required at any time
Issue Version 1.0 (15th December 2011) Part One
PLEASE NOTE: Postcodes which map to Exchange Only Lines are not shown in this report.
Please do not forward
Openreach reserves the right to modify delivery criteria and delivery dates.
© British Telecommunications plc 2011 The ten fields, for each record, are as follows --
(1) SAU_ID
(2) Name
(3) Postcode
(4) SAU_NODE_ID
(5) Exchange Only Flag
(6) Percent Lines
(7) Uplift
(8) Phase
(9) Deployed
(10) FTTC or FTTP The " 6b" is the phase of a particular deployment.
[Edit: Ten fields per record, not nine.]
-----------------------------------------------------
100% Linux and, previously, Unix.
Edited by burakkucat (Wed 01-Feb-12 22:44:32)
|
|
|
Bob,
As I don't use any Redmond based Company's software, I downloaded both parts, concatenated them, converted the line endings from DOS to Unix, stripped off the heading, sorted the entire file and then re-inserted the heading.
When I perform a look-up, I just grep the file for the item in question.
-----------------------------------------------------
100% Linux and, previously, Unix.
|
|
|
so it looks like no fibre broadband yet for me then
or do you think bt may update it later on
can you please give me a list of postcodes on cab no 2
to see how many homes are in the same boat .
If enough people are affected maybe bt may finish the job.
It worked back in 2003 to get broadband for knottingley
thanks again for your help
David
Edited by deleted (Wed 01-Feb-12 22:46:00)
|
|
|
so it looks like no fibre broadband yet for me then
or do you think bt may update it later on Possibly, yes. But who can rationalise the actions of " The Evil Empire" of 81 Newgate Street, London, EC1A 7AJ?
can you please give me a list of postcodes on cab no 2
to see how many homes are in the same boat . Certainly . . .
[ajb@Duo2 Postcode_to_PCP_December_2011]$ awk -F, '$4 ~ "{MYKNO}{P2}" { print $3 }' *.csv | sed 's/10/1 0/'
WF11 0HR
WF11 0HY
WF11 0JG
WF11 0JZ
WF11 0LA
WF11 0LE
WF11 0LG
WF11 0LT
WF11 0PF
-----------------------------------------------------
100% Linux and, previously, Unix.
Edited by burakkucat (Wed 01-Feb-12 22:59:18)
|
|
|
|
Thanks for posting the list around 200 - 250 homes
plus 4 firms are using Cab 2 .
thanks Again
David
|
|
|
|
Morning All,
I managed to find my postcode on the December 2011 Part 2 where it appears as below.
LSCLPM,SOUTH CLAPHAM,SW178AJ,{LSCLPM}{M_A},1,100%,,,,
I believe this indicates our cabinet is not due for the Rollout however I am confused by our Cabinet ID. What does the M_A stand for?
|
|
|
|
Directly fed from the exchange. No cabinet in the line=no FTTC
|
|
|
|
In the cabinet id of "{M_A}", it seems that the "A" can be a letter of the alphabet - A, B, C, D etc have been seen. Everything seems to get the "M" label, but I haven't seen anyone say what this means yet.
I guess it might identify the MDF that the cable comes from, or the exchange manhole that it runs through. Any other ideas?
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the quick reply.
You can't have FTTC without the C!
We are about 1Km from the exchange with 3 cabinets fairly close to us 400m being the closest and the other two at 600m. Within 300m from us there are houses that are serviced by LSBAL that will be or are already getting FTTC.
The current connection can't really be described as terrible. I am currently connected to a VPN in the Czech Republic and getting around 3Mbps down but my other machines are getting around 5Mbps down with everything connected at the same time. Occasionally I do see the speeds going up to as much as 10Mbps down.
It's just frustrating having cabinets so close that are FTTC enabled!
I wish BT were a bit more forthcoming with their explanations.
|
|
|
I wish BT were a bit more forthcoming with their explanations.
hear hear!!
I don't know why they think the truth will hurt us.....
If anything, if btopenreach/bt had a list of where current work is going on, and where its due next, i know a lot of people that would start getting the sausages in for the nice openreach mans tea and sarnies
|
|
|
I wish BT were a bit more forthcoming with their explanations.
hear hear!!
I don't know why they think the truth will hurt us.....
If anything, if btopenreach/bt had a list of where current work is going on, and where its due next, i know a lot of people that would start getting the sausages in for the nice openreach mans tea and sarnies
Heck I'd take a couple of days off work and be the tea boy if OR fitted out my line with FTTP...
|
|
|
|
Could someone help me to understand the ten fields for each record in December_2012_PCP
(1) SAU_ID - In my case NDRAM for Ramsgate in Kent OK
(2) Name Ramsgate OK
(3) Postcode CT118EG OK
(4) SAU_NODE_ID {NDRAM}{P17} That's the cabinet that I am on ?
(5) Exchange Only Flag 0 Here I am lost
(6) Percent Lines 100 Still lost
(7) Uplift 3.66 ???
(8) Phase 8a I presume this just indicates the order in which roll out will be done ?
(9) Deployed Yes ???
(10) FTTC or FTTP FTTC It will be fibre to the cabinet and not to premises.
Thanks in advance if you can enlighten me.
David
|
|
|
Yes.
Cab 17
Percent lines, the percentage of lines in that post code that are fed from that cabinet. 100 = all.
Exchange only flag 0 means this is a cabinet data line for this postcode. Flag 1 would be if the percent figure was less than 100, say 60, and there was another line somewhere for the same postcode with percent 40 and data for those. There could be more entries, so maybe 60 cab 17, 30 some other cab, 10 exchange.
Uplift 3.66 means multiply your current speed by 3.66 and that's about what you can expect.
Deployed Yes means it is planned to be done. These days it can also mean is done, but you would know if it was.
Yes, Phase 8a is just to do with the job sequencing. None of us have any ideas of dates.
Yes, in this case FTTC.
Edit - exchange flag is unclear above. It is only set to 1 on the data that is the feed from the exchange. If there is/are one or more cabs also serving the postcode, they will have flag = 0.
My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk
My domains,website and mail hosting - Tsohost. Internet connection - IDNet Home Starter Fibre. Live BQM.
"Where talent is a dwarf, self-esteem is a giant." - Jean-Antoine Petit-Senn.
Edited by RobertoS (Fri 03-Feb-12 19:48:46)
|
|
|
In the cabinet id of "{M_A}", it seems that the "A" can be a letter of the alphabet - A, B, C, D etc have been seen. Everything seems to get the "M" label, but I haven't seen anyone say what this means yet.
I guess it might identify the MDF that the cable comes from, or the exchange manhole that it runs through. Any other ideas? Just to add to the confusion, I have collated all the entries not of the "{P number}" format that appeare in the "SAU_NODE_ID" field. They are --
| Text | 1
23
45
67
89
| M_A PE11 PE3 PE93 PP125T PP52T
M_B PE12 PE30 PFCC1 PP127T PP53TM_C PE13 PE31 PHOW PP145T PP5T
M_D PE16 PE4 PMDF2 PP18T PP61TM_E PE18 PE5 PP108T PP1T PP6T
M_F PE19 PE6 PP109T PP2T PP7TPCMUX1 PE2 PE7 PP117T PP43T PS1
PE1 PE20 PE8 PP118T PP49T PS2PE10 PE21 PE9 PP124T PP4T |
-----------------------------------------------------
100% Linux and, previously, Unix.
Edited by burakkucat (Sat 04-Feb-12 02:58:27)
|
|
|
|
Thanks a lot . I am getting about 13 Mb/s download on my ADSL+ annexM so I work that out to be about "up to 47 M/bs". So now I will have to wait and see what I get when it becomes available to me, Thanks again.
David
|
Pages in this thread: 
Print Thread
deleted
