General Discussion
  >> Fibre Broadband


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 21-Jun-12 20:09:40
Print Post

80/20 not fast enough? try bonding


[link to this post]
 
Quite pleased with this result..

http://speedtest.net/result/2020483057.png
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 21-Jun-12 21:44:29
Print Post

Re: 80/20 not fast enough? try bonding


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
I'm maxing out around the 140MB/s mark with my bonded connection.

~150 meters from the cab, using a Mikrotik RB751G-2HnD
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 21-Jun-12 22:18:52
Print Post

Re: 80/20 not fast enough? try bonding


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Nice - your upload is faster than my download speed smile


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User D_an_W
(committed) Fri 22-Jun-12 07:06:07
Print Post

Re: 80/20 not fast enough? try bonding


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
My speeds took a jump (For the better) this morning 16 days after upgrading to 80/20 but nothing like that!

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Fri 22-Jun-12 07:55:34
Print Post

Re: 80/20 not fast enough? try bonding


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
I thought bonded FTTC was 200/60Mbps ... still falling short of the advertised speed there!

Still that is impressive.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Fri 22-Jun-12 18:07:27
Print Post

Re: 80/20 not fast enough? try bonding


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by 5km:
I thought bonded FTTC was 200/60Mbps ... still falling short of the advertised speed there!

Still that is impressive.


on a 80/20 service and bonded with 2 lines is 160/40, it ain't rocket science
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Fri 22-Jun-12 18:10:45
Print Post

Re: 80/20 not fast enough? try bonding


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Meh! I was just referring to the advertised speeds. Looking at this again that is for 3 lines bonded. Can't understand why that isn't advertised at 240/60Mbps.

http://www.fluidata.co.uk/connectivity/purefluid/
Standard User Kr1s69
(knowledge is power) Fri 22-Jun-12 19:24:12
Print Post

Re: 80/20 not fast enough? try bonding


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
I'd guess your guaranteeing yourself some crosstalk if 3 lines come all the way into the same property and are used simultaneously.

Kris

Sky Broadband Unlimited
Ashington (Northumberland) Exchange
Fibre due June 2012!
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Fri 22-Jun-12 19:57:44
Print Post

Re: 80/20 not fast enough? try bonding


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
I'm not with Fluidata so have no idea where they get 200/60 from but checking the webpage it says "up to" so is actually pretty meaningless and doesn't mention how many circuits are being combined.

My lines only sync at around 60/20 because of the cabinet distance and there's also an overhead to the multilink protocol, overall I'm quite pleased, the upload speed has made our offsite backup run a lot faster.

@tuff I'm also using a MikroTik router, the 450G, it has the 680mhz cpu which can be overclocked to 800mhz, current CPU stats are: Max: 59%; Average: 4%; Current: 1%

@kris My modems are unlocked and I've not noticed crosstalk effecting the sync speeds or SNR margin.
Standard User EvD
(learned) Sun 24-Jun-12 18:01:04
Print Post

Re: 80/20 not fast enough? try bonding


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
I was going to try bonding with IDNet, bought that router but the configuration of it looked an absolute nightmare. Decided against it frown
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 25-Jun-12 09:57:54
Print Post

Re: 80/20 not fast enough? try bonding


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Can you tell us a bit more?

Who with, how much is this costing? do they host a device for you the other end? Is it properly bonded in as much as a single stream can consume both links? (Speedtest.net is multithreaded so unfair) One set of IPs?

I already have two lines but I load balance at present and it is a royal pain..

Thanks!
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 25-Jun-12 21:42:20
Print Post

Re: 80/20 not fast enough? try bonding


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
I'm with Goscomb Technolgies (it says on the speedtest image) which is L2TP via Entanet.

I have 4 FTTC circuits, 3 bonded and 1 backup (BGP failover). I pay about the same as Zen/IDNet/ADSL24 equivalent products (500gb per line so 2TB a month overall).

It's Multilink PPP to their Cisco LNS so properly bonded both downstream and upstream.

Hope that answers your questions.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 25-Jun-12 23:14:55
Print Post

Re: 80/20 not fast enough? try bonding


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Ah sorry I assumed they were just the carrier. Thanks for the info smile

Its clearly priced for business! Making A&A looking reasonable...

Good news on the mlppp, the best solution all round.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 26-Jun-12 21:02:21
Print Post

Re: 80/20 not fast enough? try bonding


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
I'm with ADSL24 and using 2 x 80/20 bonded connections with mlppp. 1 IP etc.

I use ADSL24 for my line rental too.

I'm very pleased with the service.

I'm there first and afaik to date only bonded customer, been bonded with the 40/10 service for over a year previously. Unlike some other ISP's I ain't paid any extra charge for bonded per month.

I'm maxing the lines out at around 135-140MB/s and when you consider I was paying more to BE for a bonded ADSL2+ service with 12MB/s it's a no brainer.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 26-Jun-12 21:11:27
Print Post

Re: 80/20 not fast enough? try bonding


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
The "current speed test" in your sig isn't very impressive wink
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to