General Discussion
  >> Fibre Broadband


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | [4] | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User MHC
(sensei) Thu 16-Oct-14 17:42:56
Print Post

Re: BT MK2 vs MK3 faceplate


[re: Zarjaz] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Zarjaz:
Kellys told you that ... where is the salt?

Indeed ..... bunch of pillocks.



I was trying to be polite smile


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

M H C


taurus excreta cerebrum vincit
Standard User Stevesdad
(newbie) Thu 16-Oct-14 18:08:17
Print Post

Re: BT MK2 vs MK3 faceplate


[re: MHC] [link to this post]
 
It's BT that decided the faceplates with screws need changing not Kellys..
Standard User MHC
(sensei) Thu 16-Oct-14 18:38:37
Print Post

Re: BT MK2 vs MK3 faceplate


[re: Stevesdad] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Stevesdad:
It's BT that decided the faceplates with screws need changing not Kellys..


Has anyone suggested anything different?


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

M H C


taurus excreta cerebrum vincit


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User youngsyp
(member) Fri 17-Oct-14 15:59:31
Print Post

Re: BT MK2 vs MK3 faceplate


[re: GeekOfBroadband] [link to this post]
 
I've just moved from a Mk2 to a Mk3 on my ADSL service and the SNRM is higher and appears to fluctuate less too. After a resync, sync rate is a little higher too. I'll monitor to see if the improvements are sustained...
Off topic but, I have an unlocked Eircom F1000 that I've just configured to run as a modem only so will install that at some stage to look for further improvement.

This is all in preparation for migrating to fibre (everything crossed) in December.

Paul

ISP: Xilo
Service: Talk & Surf 100
Exchange: SMYG
Cabinet: 4
MSAN: Broadcom
Modem/ router: Billion BiPac 7800N
Attenuation:39.5dB
Target SNRM: 3.3dB or 52% of ISP
Current sync: 9755kbps
FTTC cab in place but not enabled..... yet!
Standard User youngsyp
(member) Fri 17-Oct-14 16:00:57
Print Post

Re: BT MK2 vs MK3 faceplate


[re: youngsyp] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by youngsyp:
And so mixed that you can only rationally take the comments/ experiences on face value.

As I understand it, you'll only really see any difference/ improvement if you're currently suffering from some sort of REIN, as it's just a filter change.

Paul
Blast, this is the post I should have quoted/ replied too.

Paul

ISP: Xilo
Service: Talk & Surf 100
Exchange: SMYG
Cabinet: 4
MSAN: Broadcom
Modem/ router: Billion BiPac 7800N
Attenuation:39.5dB
Target SNRM: 3.3dB or 52% of ISP
Current sync: 9755kbps
FTTC cab in place but not enabled..... yet!
Standard User Provster
(member) Fri 17-Oct-14 16:09:30
Print Post

Re: BT MK2 vs MK3 faceplate


[re: GeekOfBroadband] [link to this post]
 
I had a recent install 10 days ago but they put in a MK2 rather than an MK3. I guess both are still used?

ZeN Fibre Unlimited 2
80000/20000 sync - 150m from cabinet - Consistently awesome speeds of 8.5mb/sec at any time of day!
Speed Test
Standard User Zarjaz
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Fri 17-Oct-14 21:53:09
Print Post

Re: BT MK2 vs MK3 faceplate


[re: Stevesdad] [link to this post]
 
It's BT that decided the faceplates with screws need changing not Kellys..

Yes, but if anyone pays attention, they don't say that the screw terminal NTE's need to be swapped out unless faulty.

Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | [4] | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to