In reply to a post by gt94sss2:

Link?

You will also know that Plusnet have only recently adopted the HH5A for their own fibre service as well which they wouldn't have done if it wasn't fit for purpose.

Yeah... I don't think we're getting a link.. or any type of evidence for that matter... this area stinks... almost like someone.......

Are you using a HH5A?

Type B..... however synced on fast path with an attainable of over 110Mb/s so no need for G.INP right now...

However I've told you before that I've done a lot of testing at the time G.INP was enabled and can be certain that HH5a is G.INP capable...

If your hub don't work with G.INP it must be a dud or your lines capability shrunk around the time G.INP came about... its not like you can prove G.INP is enabled or not... a HH don't tell such tales....

In reply to a post by mlmclaren:

its not like you can prove G.INP is enabled or not... a HH don't tell such tales....

I know, that's what I've been saying. So your assurance it does is to be taken with a pinch of salt.

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

In reply to a post by mlmclaren:

its not like you can prove G.INP is enabled or not... a HH don't tell such tales....

I know, that's what I've been saying. So your assurance it does is to be taken with a pinch of salt.

So why do you keep on insisting it doesn't support it then... the facts say that it does and currently your saying it doesn't support it based on using one and not being able to tell...

I accept your arguments of there being no 'official' evidence however this doesn't mean you can continue to tell the 'majority' it doesn't...

Edited by mlmclaren (Sun 24-Jan-16 16:14:26)

Because if it did, there would be evidence. As someone pointed out, a GEA test result would show if retransmission was present on a line having a HH5A.

And although Plusnet have been known to post GEA test results, (though not for the Hub One so far as I know), or at least give them to customers who have posted them, it is only posters who have decided the Hub One is a rebadged HH5A.

It is certainly based on the HH5A, or whatever that is based on, that has been confirmed by Plusnet, but we haven't been told of any internal or firmware changes that may or may not have been made.

We do know of one obvious configuration change at least.

So GEA test results from one of those wouldn't help, and the assertion earlier that the deployment of it means the HH5A is downstream G.INP compliant is unsafe.

In reply to a post by RobertoS:

We do know of one obvious configuration change at least.

Not having been a Plusnet customer for a while, out of interest what config change do you refer too?

So GEA test results from one of those wouldn't help, and the assertion earlier that the deployment of it means the HH5A is downstream G.INP compliant is unsafe.

Unlike BB appears too, I hope you would accept that support for downstream G.INP was a mandatory requirement when the HH5A was launched - and would have had to have demonstrated this in order to be approved as a CPE (even if you discount the experiences of those who have multiple CPEs to play with)

Edited by gt94sss2 (Sun 24-Jan-16 16:55:55)

They disabled smart setup.

It's not "guesswork" on my part, it's a reasonable conclusion based on a number of experiments and observations. That's a long way from a "guess", even if it isn't definitive proof. Unfortunately nobody appears to be able to produce this, one way or another.