ES on the high side.

DLM may intervene downward again.

Ian

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

I wonder if you're connected to an ECI cabinet or a Huawei?

I checked my cab on this site https://www.telecom-tariffs.co.uk/ and it says it is a Huawei cabinet.

It's just looks like you're on fast path which I usually associate with ECI

In reply to a post by maniac886:

I checked my cab on this site https://www.telecom-tariffs.co.uk/ and it says it is a Huawei cabinet.

As you are using a Huawei HG612 as the modem, if you were to establish telnet acess to it and invoke the Busybox shell, then the output produced by the following command will clarify matters --

xdslcmd info --vendor

In the output there will be a line referencing "ChipSet Vendor Id". Following that string will be an identifier. If the identifier begins with BDCM (i.e. Broadcom) then the cabinet is Huawei equipped. If the identifier begins with IFTN (i.e. Infineon) then the cabinet is ECI equipped.

In reply to a post by burakkucat:

In reply to a post by maniac886:

I checked my cab on this site https://www.telecom-tariffs.co.uk/ and it says it is a Huawei cabinet.

As you are using a Huawei HG612 as the modem, if you were to establish telnet acess to it and invoke the Busybox shell, then the output produced by the following command will clarify matters --

xdslcmd info --vendor

In the output there will be a line referencing "ChipSet Vendor Id". Following that string will be an identifier. If the identifier begins with BDCM (i.e. Broadcom) then the cabinet is Huawei equipped. If the identifier begins with IFTN (i.e. Infineon) then the cabinet is ECI equipped.

Just done that and the output is BDCM:0xa48c.

In reply to a post by maniac886:

Just done that and the output is BDCM:0xa48c.

So you have confirmed that you are, indeed, connected via a Huawei equipped cabinet.

Just to provide an update to this thread - in the last day or so G.INP was re-activated and I now have a 6Mbps increase on my downstream sync rate. The speed overall is faster than when I was with BT. I believe its taken over 2 months to re-activate on the line.

That's good news.

There's something interesting about all this. In general I at least, and I think perhaps others, have seen G.INP as being something implemented to improve things when DLM has already put significant interleaving on the line, with a minimum 8ms delay added to latency alongside that interleaving.

In your case there was no interleaving and no "Delay" setting. G.INP has simply improved the sync. I wonder why it didn't do it on Day 3?

Please could you post the current stats?

Edited by RobertoS (Sun 14-Aug-16 10:54:33)

In reply to a post by RobertoS:

That's good news.

There's something interesting about all this. In general I at least, and I think perhaps others, have seen G.INP as being something implemented to improve things when DLM has already put significant interleaving on the line, with a minimum 8ms delay added to latency alongside that interleaving.

In your case there was no interleaving and no "Delay" setting. G.INP has simply improved the sync. I wonder why it didn't do it on Day 3?

Please could you post the current stats?

I had almost given up it ever being activated again. Click the link below to see before and after stats.

Before and after stats

Thanks for the stats .

They tie in with what I said in the post. Interesting.