General Discussion
  >> Fibre Broadband


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 30-Aug-16 14:10:41
Print Post

FTTP splitter markings


[link to this post]
 
So, a couple of fibre splitters have appeared on poles near to us in the past month, each having writing on them. The nearest one is pictured below. I'm guessing the writing means something to someone, but what?

The exchange is SWLKD so I guess that's the "LKD" after FTTP on the third line.

Any advances on the rest?

Fibre splitter writing
Standard User Zarjaz
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Tue 30-Aug-16 21:50:52
Print Post

Re: FTTP splitter markings


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
That page won't open for me, sorry.

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 30-Aug-16 21:56:44
Print Post

Re: FTTP splitter markings


[re: Zarjaz] [link to this post]
 
works here without logging in to my account

can I embed or is there a preferred picture hosting site?


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 30-Aug-16 21:59:59
Print Post

Re: FTTP splitter markings


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
SDBIOIW
BDUK-WALES
FTTP-LKD
ON60523
IBLIJKLL
XAABX34
CT.BNE


The I may be 1
Standard User Zarjaz
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Tue 30-Aug-16 22:46:59
Print Post

Re: FTTP splitter markings


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Have a look at this splitter node, you can see some similarities in the markings.

All the splitter nodes I have ever seen the ID always begin 'TS', but maybe thats a local thing to here.

Standard User PaulKirby
(fountain of knowledge) Wed 31-Aug-16 01:21:28
Print Post

Re: FTTP splitter markings


[re: Zarjaz] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Zarjaz:
That page won't open for me, sorry.
I have uploaded their image onto my server here (JPG) or here (PNG) I think that's FTTP and not a Splitter Node, but I might be wrong.

Paul

Edited by PaulKirby (Wed 31-Aug-16 01:22:48)

Standard User unknown101
(learned) Wed 31-Aug-16 08:42:14
Print Post

Re: FTTP splitter markings


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Top line probably refers to contractor/engineering ID.
Two up from the bottom is an internal "estimate" number for the job to install the equipment.
Last lines are the contractor that installed it CT Carillion Telent and BNE Barden Network Engineering.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sat 03-Sep-16 18:31:04
Print Post

Re: FTTP splitter markings


[re: unknown101] [link to this post]
 
How many premises does each one of these serve?

The reason I ask is that of the two mentioned in my original post, one is here, and the other is two posts along outside the next property along the road in the direction seen on the map.

I can't imagine that each property will have one each so what geographical radius or line length would each one serve?
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sat 03-Sep-16 18:45:33
Print Post

Re: FTTP splitter markings


[re: unknown101] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by unknown101:
Top line probably refers to contractor/engineering ID.
Two up from the bottom is an internal "estimate" number for the job to install the equipment.
Last lines are the contractor that installed it CT Carillion Telent and BNE Barden Network Engineering.


Yeah exactly right. Fourth line down is the Optical Network ID "ON". That just the unique ID for the fibre circuit in the system.
Standard User Zarjaz
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Sun 04-Sep-16 08:52:29
Print Post

Re: FTTP splitter markings


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
or line length would each one serve?

I suspect you may have misunderstood something, this is FTTP, nothing to to with line length at all.

The 'next one down' as you put it might be a DP node rather than a splitter node.

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 04-Sep-16 12:41:22
Print Post

Re: FTTP splitter markings


[re: Zarjaz] [link to this post]
 
Yes, I know that it's not like copper but was thinking more along the lines of how long a fibre line can be before it needs connecting with some hardware that requires power or what not.

The 'next one down' is the photo in the OP.

Both boxes look the same but I'll try and get a photo of the one on the post on the map later.
Standard User Zarjaz
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Sun 04-Sep-16 13:00:26
Print Post

Re: FTTP splitter markings


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
When the kit is pole mounted the housing is the same for splitter and DP nodes.

Standard User cymru123
(regular) Sun 04-Sep-16 13:01:52
Print Post

Re: FTTP splitter markings


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by fiddler:
...thinking more along the lines of how long a fibre line can be before it needs connecting with some hardware that requires power or what not


Openreach's FTTP is GPON and is passive so no electric powered hardware needed between exchange and property.

It all depends on how many splits and chains in the fibre is needed to cover the number of properties/area.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 04-Sep-16 20:53:57
Print Post

Re: FTTP splitter markings


[re: cymru123] [link to this post]
 
Thanks.

Is there any loss when two lengths are connected, say to connect a distance longer than the length of one length of fibre?
Administrator MrSaffron
(staff) Sun 04-Sep-16 21:01:39
Print Post

Re: FTTP splitter markings


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Any fibre joint carries the risk of loss, but this is measured and deployments are planned so that there is no loss of useful signal at the distances involved.

FTTP/FTTH is essentially a fixed connection speed service rather than the variable connection speed services of xDSL

The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to