Question is - will there be a P1, P2 and whatever E_1 becomes or is P2 actually what E_1 has become?
So 3 cabs in total or two?
I think it is safe to say that Codelook doesn't handle transitions very well. When copper re-arrangement is going on, the data loses some of its consistency ... Previously, we've seen it happen with postcode data, but perhaps now we'll see it more with cabinet data as the projects start to do more an more infill.
It would be safest to assume, for now, that there will be 2 cabs, and that cab P2 and cab E_1 are going to be the same thing.
My working assumption (even with the earlier argument in this thread) is that a cabinet named "E_1" has been given that name as a temporary label, generated (at some point) from thinking that it will be providing infill for EO bundle 1.
I make no further assumption about how/whether/when the name becomes a permanent one; there has been too little indication of that.
P2 looks like it covers the postcodes for EO bundle 4 and EO bundle 5, if codelook is right, but doesn't say it covers EO bundle 1.
But looking at the map of postcodes, P2 coverage goes right up to the EO bundle 1 area. I conclude that it could end up as infill for EO bundle 1, but doesn't quite have the postcodes right yet. Or it might not.