Perhaps the many knowledgeable users of this forum can help me understand why Openreach have carried out some apparently quite expensive civil works.
Some background: I live in a village in one of two connected closes of 29 dwellings built in the late 1970s. All services (no gas) are underground and the copper telephone connection to my house arrives internally with no external junction box.
The thinkbroadband map shows the properties to be “Under Review” for Project Gigabit. A couple of months ago I received a letter from CityFibre, in a buff envelope with HMG’s logo on it, saying they were planning the build in the area and inviting me to register interest for FTTP. Openreach’s broadband checker returns “We’ll be building in this area in the next year”, again inviting a registration of interest.
This month, Openreach’s contractor carried out some civil works installing ducts and a couple of “boxes” (jointing chambers?) in the footpath. They were on site for 2 weeks and, using a mini-digger etc., laid 100 metres of ducting from the start of one close, round the corner and into the start of the other. They passed just 6 dwellings with a little black box installed adjacent to the boundary of each.
It cannot have been a cheap process. There were multi-way traffic lights for the duration and masses of signs and barriers.
Why have Openreach done this work? Presumably it is a precursor to more activity. There is a dearth of information. Will other methods be used to connect the other properties to fibre? Will it be Openreach or CityFibre? Underground or, horror of horrors, new poles & overhead cables?
Perhaps someone can say what has happened elsewhere. Thanks in anticipation!
(PS – a cynic could say that Openreach is not too worried about the cost of building assets in rural areas as it adds to the base for RAB rate of return regulation.)



Print Thread
