I used to play as special forces but kept getting kicked for going into the enemy bases.
As special forces it was my job to go there and blow up the radar etc :/

MW3 is [censored] and has nothing going on thats why it runs at 60 fps, BF3 for consoles is limited to 30 fps so that Dice doesnt have to take anything out of the game.

At the end of the day BF3 = PC title its where it will be best.

MW3 is [censored]

You know what happens when you assume?
.

Do you? [censored] could be an awful lot of words...

So many COD haters .............I wonder why ?...........There is gaming after a PC so take it or leave it...............Consoles now rule the Gaming world and by far make the most money for developers and Publishers............FACT !!!

And when i say what i do please be aware that for many years i was a PC gamer myself but have moved on with the times....

Consoles are by far a lot more convenient and i don't have to be 18inch from a monitor................Yes PC on a graphical scale are well ahead but for me what they produce on consoles is all fine and dandy.

Edited by time2die (Tue 21-Jun-11 00:34:25)

If its all fine and dandy what is the point of this topic saying 30fps and not looking as good is a bad thing in some peoples cases a game breaker

If it turns out [censored] you will say "I told you so".

If it turns out ok you will say "I never said it would be [censored]".
.

I never said it bothered me Mr Falcon as i am just quoting news links from other sources.

I will complain however if the game frame rate dropped to 5 to 10 fps within certain areas of the game if that happened.

Nothing worse than a great game with much going on with terrible slow down,funny enough the worse experience with this i have encountered was with Crysis on a Pc .

There are also some area of Crysis 2 on the Playstation 3 that have some really bad slow down .

Post was really to just add fuel to the fire regarding MW3 v B3 because there are quite a few on here that like to knock MW games or COD games generally even though those same people on here will be first in the queue to buy it

I am most definitely not a COD hater and probably spend more time playing COD games competitively and for fun than your average Joe . And that's all titles from COD3 to the present day . Been playing with the same team since MW and we don't often come away with out a win .

Thing is you can not pretend that MW3 is being made by the same people as MW and MW2 , it might say IW on the box but we all know the core development team have left IW .

Once you get past the hype , you have to ask questions about what is going on with the multiplayer , who the [censored] are Beachhead and can they be trusted with this multi billion dollar franchise ? Well i don't trust them as i don't know who the [censored] they are .

And that's where i am , sitting on the fence and not getting sucked in by the hype , this COD as the potential to be the worst COD since COD3 , lets hope that is not the case .

As for frame rates , i agree about Crysis but that game looked stunning and im prepared to let a drop in frame rate happen now and again , as long as the game does not become unplayable .

30 FPS wont make a blind bit of difference! Like someone above said, COD doesn't have much to run, Battlefield has so much more going on. You won't be able to tell that much, it will still look visually amazing, if COD looks SLIGHTLY better big deal, I would much rather have better gameplay over a few FPS. You need to take a step back and look at some of the things you say, half of it doesn't make sense and you repeat the same things like a parrot. The game is called BATTLEFIELD as well not BATTLEFIELDS.

I'm not a COD hater, I'm going to buy both, I just get infuriated when I see small minded gamers who only care about something looking slightly more pretty than the other. At the end of the day it's called a game and you play it, the main focus should be on the gameplay.

I'm going to stop coming on these forums, it's getting boring reading the same tripe in 4 different threads. It's a shame because some people on here have valid points and arguments but others just ramble about the same [censored].