General Discussion
  >> General Broadband Chatter


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


These posts have been archived and can no longer be replied to or modified.
  Print Thread
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Fri 16-Jul-10 21:47:59
Print Post

Should packet sniffing be treated as phone tapping?


[link to this post]
 
Should packet sniffing by ISPs to determine what type of data it is be classified in the same way as phone tapping?
Standard User djfunkdup
(member) Fri 16-Jul-10 22:10:49
Print Post

Re: Should packet sniffing be treated as phone tapping?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
NO.......






that was an easy one.. wink

-----------------------------------------------------
virgin media b / b .xxl....50mbps....... t / v .xl......v+ hd .......... L/L .talk unlimited
-----------------------------------------------------
[IMG]http://www.pingtest.net/result/2247967.png[/IMG]
-----------------------------------------------------

My Broadband Speed Test
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Fri 16-Jul-10 22:15:19
Print Post

Re: Should packet sniffing be treated as phone tapping?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by gbhxu:
Should packet sniffing by ISPs to determine what type of data it is be classified in the same way as phone tapping?


It already is.

Oh I see, to determine what type. It already is, but there's an exemption in RIPA which permits use of DPI for legitimate network management.

Edited by deleted (Sat 17-Jul-10 00:08:09)


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User kwikbreaks
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Sat 17-Jul-10 09:22:06
Print Post

Re: Should packet sniffing be treated as phone tapping?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Traffic shaping provides benefits to the vast majority of customers - ie those who would like to be able to use the service for it's design purposes rather than flat out 24x7 torrents.

At least one ISP has built their business on traffic shaping - PlusNet. The results of what happens when neither shaping nor caps are used (huge contention) can be seen in the gripes and moans on here (e.g. about O2 Access)



If you can't fix it with a hammer you've got an electrical problem.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sat 17-Jul-10 10:46:21
Print Post

Re: Should packet sniffing be treated as phone tapping?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Should packet sniffing by routers to determine how to route the packet be classified as phone tapping?

Next question?
Standard User yarwell
(sensei) Sat 17-Jul-10 10:58:25
Print Post

Re: Should packet sniffing be treated as phone tapping?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
no.

Phil

MaxDSL - goes as fast as it can and doesn't read the line checker first.

MaxDSL diagnostics
Are your kids pirates ? Limewire, Bearshare, Kazaa, BitTorrent, eMule are all tools of the trade.
  Print Thread

Jump to