General Discussion
  >> General Broadband Chatter


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | >> (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User yarwell
(sensei) Sun 10-Mar-13 14:37:32
Print Post

Re: "Fibre" faceplate on new ADSL line


[re: MHC] [link to this post]
 
The SIN specifies a minimum 55, haven't measured it myself.

--

Phil

MaxDSL - goes as fast as it can and doesn't read the line checker first.

MaxDSL diagnostics
Standard User Zarjaz
(knowledge is power) Sun 10-Mar-13 14:40:46
Print Post

Re: "Fibre" faceplate on new ADSL line


[re: yarwell] [link to this post]
 
You still need a 'normal' NTE faceplate to go on the front of the VDSL faceplate !

Standard User MHC
(sensei) Sun 10-Mar-13 23:55:11
Print Post

Re: "Fibre" faceplate on new ADSL line


[re: yarwell] [link to this post]
 
The SIN is one thing (which should reflect the ETSI standard but may be stricter), how the filter operate and their characteristics are something different.

How often do you hear of a need to double filter?


We both know that even putting 55dB extra attenuation on a short line will still allow ADSL to achieve sync if the original attenuation was 20 dB or less.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

M H C


taurus excreta cerebrum vincit


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User yarwell
(sensei) Mon 11-Mar-13 11:50:28
Print Post

Re: "Fibre" faceplate on new ADSL line


[re: MHC] [link to this post]
 
The SIN is one thing (which should reflect the ETSI standard but may be stricter), how the filter operate and their characteristics are something different.
Only if they're non-compliant ! It does reference the ETSI standard.

--

Phil

MaxDSL - goes as fast as it can and doesn't read the line checker first.

MaxDSL diagnostics
Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | >> (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to