In reply to a post by RobertoS:

Or not! (Think about it).

Yes; I did spot it .

In reply to a post by RobertoS:

It isn't txt spk.

u r rng

In reply to a post by gomezz:

In reply to a post by RobertoS:

It isn't txt spk.

u r rng

Oh God, don't start.
I don't do text speak (even in text messages).

In reply to a post by gomezz:

In reply to a post by RobertoS:

It isn't txt spk.

u r rng

Uh uh!

As I said, text speak is intelligible. That isn't, as even with full words it is gibberish. It has no meaning, therefore it is non-speak.

Let's see:

i was told that u r with aol so y am i going to be charged from aol a disconection fee to go with talk talk well i wont to cancel talk talk

I was told "you are with AOL"

so why am I going to be charged a disconnection fee by AOL to go to talk-talk?

Well, I want to cancel talk-talk!

Edited by deleted (Sun 28-Nov-10 13:00:15)

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

Let's see:

i was told that u r with aol so y am i going to be charged from aol a disconection fee to go with talk talk well i wont to cancel talk talk

I was told "you are with AOL"

so why am I going to be charged a disconnection fee by AOL to go to talk-talk?

Well, I want to cancel talk-talk!

I think my version is more intelligible (let's see the OP work that one out).

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

Let's see:

i was told that u r with aol so y am i going to be charged from aol a disconection fee to go with talk talk well i wont to cancel talk talk

I was told "you are with AOL"

so why am I going to be charged a disconnection fee by AOL to go to talk-talk?

Well, I want to cancel talk-talk!

Well done. I think you, and the rest of the guys, have finally cracked the coded message.
But it raises an interesting question about disconnection: is it always the case nowadays that, when moving from one ISP family to another, a disconnection fee is automatically charged?

That's still nonsense.

1) The internal question doesn't give sufficient information about the situation to allow us to answer it.
2) The statement that he want to cancel TT is of no interst to anybody.

Why doesn't he just cancel TT?

In reply to a post by RobertoS:

That's still nonsense.

1) The internal question doesn't give sufficient information about the situation to allow us to answer it.
2) The statement that he want to cancel TT is of no interst to anybody.

Why doesn't he just cancel TT?

He wants to.

It's very nice of him to let us know, but I think that's something he needs to talk to TT about rather than TBB.