Absolutely positive.
But I couldn't look at the document, because I'm not prepared to sign up for that Microsoft tosh, sorry. (That's a separate subject, already discussed in FC, although I wasn't a party to that conversation, and didn't even know what they were on about 'til just now.)
It wouldn't even matter if call charges were slightly higher, as I make landline voice calls very rarely indeed. Certainly less than once a week, and often less than once a month.
All things considered, I suppose I only keep a landline (i) to host the broadband, and (ii) in case of emergency. It's probably not wise to depend entirely on mobile for the latter.
The only thing I can see that erodes the cost saving slightly, is that PN would charge me £1 a month for caller ID, which BT currently throw in for free. Actually looks like an oversight on the part of BT, as my call plan doesn't seem to mention anywhere that I have it, and pretty sure I'm not paying for it. I think they forgot to remove it when the "rolling" contract idea was scuppered. Either that, or they decided it wasn't worth manually removing from every account that took it as part of the promotion.
Edit: Huh? Verrrrry odd! Previous clicking on that link led me to Microsoft Windows Live, or whatever they now call it, which I refused to sign into, as it wanted me to provide additional security details NOT required by my legacy Hotmail/MSN Messemger account for the last 10+ (???) years! But having declined the log-in earlier, clicking the link now does not take me to that page at all, but direct to the document, as originally intended.
I can see you haven't edited the link, as there's no edit stamp on your post. So now wondering if I'm going ever-so-slightly mad.
T.
Edited by TLM (Tue 13-Nov-12 17:33:20)