AMD would be the logical choice to swallow the x86 / product side of the business. Perhaps with the AMD-Intel brand in tow, it would make big corporate customers feel all warm and fuzzy, knowing that there was "Intel inside" even if only skin cardboard deep.
It would at this juncture make sense to do. Even with Jim keller's help to bring some amd "glue" intel are still in a mess. Intel still though makes a ton of cash in other areas though. They completely messed up Optane for instance, charged royalties for Thunderbolt etc and remember the physical keys you had to buy to unlook cpu features.
The Intel foundry business is bleeding cash. Just maybe TSMC or Samsung would buy it. But successive failures developing future processes would make it less than appealing. TSMC already make a whole bunch of stuff under contract for Intel including their latest Arrow Lake and Lunar Lake CPU components and they are miles ahead of Intel in foundry capability.
Reminds me of AMD's foundry, back then they were several nodes behind and couldn't execute and intel was at that time executing well - before 14+++++++++++ episode. Even now Glo Flo can't do what TSMC (i always say tmsc in my head for some reason) can do in terms of nodes. At least amd didn't lie unlike Intel's stupid stupid comments
I think Rory sold the foundry arm off - i can't remember but if he did that was in hindsight the best thing amd had done. Theres a downside and its apple shaped though
The only gripe i have atm with pcs is the two pcie slot issue ...........- if you want two high end graphics cards (for rendeirng and video production) and a sfp+ (or faster) card in, you now need to have it janky in your case or go eypc.