User comments on ISPs
  >> Other Providers (without dedicated forums)


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | >> (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User Spud2003
(fountain of knowledge) Sat 30-Mar-13 10:38:03
Print Post

Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[link to this post]
 
I'm in the market for an FTTC package and have been checking ISPs for attractive offers. I would prefer to give my business to a smaller ISP but it seems none(?) of them can compete on price and data caps with the big boys. Any suggestions for smaller ISPs with interesting FTTC packages that I may have missed? Thanks in advance. smile
Standard User Spud2003
(fountain of knowledge) Sun 31-Mar-13 12:31:40
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: Spud2003] [link to this post]
 
Judging by the number of responses it seems there isn't much competition for the larger ISPs. frown Oh well, I've signed up with Plusnet. smile
Standard User ukhardy07
(fountain of knowledge) Sun 31-Mar-13 12:44:40
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: Spud2003] [link to this post]
 
Good choice!

The larger ISPs are doing great deals nowadays. Even BT!!


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User Spud2003
(fountain of knowledge) Sun 31-Mar-13 12:54:28
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: ukhardy07] [link to this post]
 
I can't really see why the average user would select a smaller ISP at the moment. Most of the small ISPs I looked at weren't even close to anything the bigger providers could offer(in terms of fundamentals like price and data caps). They must be getting absolutely crushed in the FTTC market. frown
Standard User ukhardy07
(fountain of knowledge) Sun 31-Mar-13 12:56:33
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: Spud2003] [link to this post]
 
Even for standard broadband it's similar.

Say you have no LLU in your area.

BT do truly unlimited no throttling for £16.
Smaller ISPs want £50+

Then in LLU areas it is near on impossible to beat sky's 7.50 for instance.
Standard User alotbit
(newbie) Thu 09-May-13 16:53:47
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: ukhardy07] [link to this post]
 
Hi

Sorry to hijack but I need FTTC for a business line (light usage and up to 16.2 Mbps predicted by BTwholesale checker) and the big boys are not competitive for FTTC on a business line.

The following ISPs are competitive:

ADSL24 - £16.58+vat
Chilli-mintlabs (Invictel) - £20+vat
Fast.co.uk - £18.71+vat
Goscomb - £20+vat
Greenisp - £20.56+vat
Icuk - £20.83+vat
IDNet - £22.50+vat
Merula - £20+vat
Ukfsn - £22+vat
Vivaciti - £22+vat

Money is tight and reliability is not important enough to me to pay over the odds for - BT Infinity starts at £30+vat on a business line.

I can switch phone as well.

Any thoughts much appreciated.
Standard User RobertoS
(sensei) Thu 09-May-13 21:46:30
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: alotbit] [link to this post]
 
If reliability, (ie fix time priority), is not particularly important, why do you need a business grade line? Most of the ones you list, though not all, will happily allow SOHO use on residential packages.

My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk | Domains,website and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - Plusnet UnLim Fibre (FTTC). Sync ~ 54.2/15.2Mbps @ 600m. - BQM

"Where talent is a dwarf, self-esteem is a giant." - Jean-Antoine Petit-Senn.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Allergy information: This post was manufactured in an environment where nuts are present. It may include traces of understatement, litotes and humour.
Standard User alotbit
(newbie) Fri 10-May-13 12:47:09
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
I dont need a business grade line but I prefer the number to be listed in the business section of the directory - is this possible with a residential package?
Standard User RobertoS
(sensei) Fri 10-May-13 15:07:11
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: alotbit] [link to this post]
 
A good enough reason smile.

I don't know about the question. It should be easy enough to find out?

My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk | Domains,website and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - Plusnet UnLim Fibre (FTTC). Sync ~ 54.2/15.2Mbps @ 600m. - BQM

"Where talent is a dwarf, self-esteem is a giant." - Jean-Antoine Petit-Senn.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Allergy information: This post was manufactured in an environment where nuts are present. It may include traces of understatement, litotes and humour.
Standard User vivaciti
(knowledge is power) Fri 10-May-13 15:43:56
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: alotbit] [link to this post]
 
If the phone line is a basic (residential) then you wont get it listed as a business in the directories (unless a paid for entry) but even if the phone line is a business you can still have a residential broadband service on the line.

www.vivaciti.net
Vivaciti Broadband
0800 0911797

Forum
Facebook
Standard User alotbit
(newbie) Sat 11-May-13 10:44:54
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: vivaciti] [link to this post]
 
Will any ISP do this?
Standard User RobertoS
(sensei) Sat 11-May-13 12:28:02
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: alotbit] [link to this post]
 
Asking that of an ISP who has just given a helpful reply, with no suggestion by them that you should prefer them to the others on your list, could be considered a bit of a cheeky question tongue smile.

On the subject of that list I'd certainly avoid UKFSN.

My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk | Domains,website and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - Plusnet UnLim Fibre (FTTC). Sync ~ 54.2/15.2Mbps @ 600m. - BQM

"Where talent is a dwarf, self-esteem is a giant." - Jean-Antoine Petit-Senn.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Allergy information: This post was manufactured in an environment where nuts are present. It may include traces of understatement, litotes and humour.
Standard User alotbit
(newbie) Sun 12-May-13 08:44:10
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
I didnt expect him to reply, but someone else might smile. BTW thanks for your tip on UKFSN and thanks to Vivaciti for his reply.
Standard User vivaciti
(knowledge is power) Mon 13-May-13 11:08:03
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: alotbit] [link to this post]
 
We try to help!

www.vivaciti.net
Vivaciti Broadband
0800 0911797

Forum
Facebook
Standard User zyborg47
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Mon 13-May-13 12:06:05
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: Spud2003] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Spud2003:
Judging by the number of responses it seems there isn't much competition for the larger ISPs. frown Oh well, I've signed up with Plusnet. smile


This is the problem, if I ever went for FTTC, I would love to go with a smaller ISp, but at the moment they don't offer enough for the price. I blame BT for this, it is what you get when you got a monopoly.

i don't mind paying a little bit more than I would from a larger ISp, but it is not a little more in many cases.


for what I would pay is around the £25 mark, from a small Isp it would get me 40Mb/s download, which is fine because I would not get much more, but then only 30Gb usage, ok unlimited in off peak times, but that is no good to me.
i watch Netflix and other online video, in fact it have replaced my normal TV watching, as I now don't have a licence.

I would pay £25 a month if it was say 100GB and off peak usinge unlimited, then of cause I have to think of line rental above that.

the larger Isps offer too many gimmicks for me to be honest, look at Bt, now they giving away sport Tv, which is of no interest to me, then cloud storage, free wi-fi, some system so you can use your mobile as your normal phone and god know what else.

Not everyone want all of that, all I need is a internet connection at a fair price. so until a smaller Isp can offer that, I will stay as I am with my wireless broadband.

Adrian

Desktop machine now powered by windows 7 pro 64bit , laptop by ubuntu

ALLPAY Wireless broadband
Standard User vivaciti
(knowledge is power) Mon 13-May-13 14:15:47
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: zyborg47] [link to this post]
 
We are working to come close, but can only do that on Market 3 Exchanges.
BT infinity 2 with phone line rental is £41.45 our Unlimited FTTC with phone line rental is £48.60

www.vivaciti.net
Vivaciti Broadband
0800 0911797

Forum
Facebook
Standard User zyborg47
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Mon 13-May-13 21:01:41
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: vivaciti] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by vivaciti:
We are working to come close, but can only do that on Market 3 Exchanges.
BT infinity 2 with phone line rental is £41.45 our Unlimited FTTC with phone line rental is £48.60


That is getting there, the problem I have is bundles, i have never liked this eggs in one basket thing. I know what you are going to say, you make the money ont he calls, but not if people don't make calls.

Still it is good to see that it is getting closer, the problem is how close can you get and still make money to survive?

Adrian

Desktop machine now powered by windows 7 pro 64bit , laptop by ubuntu

ALLPAY Wireless broadband
Standard User vivaciti
(knowledge is power) Mon 13-May-13 22:04:25
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: zyborg47] [link to this post]
 
Difference is you don't have to have line rental with us, we do give the option of just the broadband.

www.vivaciti.net
Vivaciti Broadband
0800 0911797

Forum
Facebook
Standard User RobertoS
(sensei) Mon 13-May-13 23:02:01
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: zyborg47] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by zyborg47:
i watch Netflix and other online video, in fact it have replaced my normal TV watching, as I now don't have a licence.
Do you watch anything this way while it is being broadcast live - i.e. live relays?

My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk | Domains,website and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - Plusnet UnLim Fibre (FTTC). Sync ~ 54.2/15.2Mbps @ 600m. - BQM

"Where talent is a dwarf, self-esteem is a giant." - Jean-Antoine Petit-Senn.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Allergy information: This post was manufactured in an environment where nuts are present. It may include traces of understatement, litotes and humour.
Standard User zyborg47
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Tue 14-May-13 01:04:09
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: vivaciti] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by vivaciti:
Difference is you don't have to have line rental with us, we do give the option of just the broadband.



That is good, no doubt it will be more expensive. Not that I am looking at FTTC at the moment, I am happy with my wireless broadband and anyway I am still under contract for another 12 months. If I do decide to go back to fixed line broadband then to FTTc, I will have a look at what you have got at the time.

The problem is FTTc is more expensive than what I am paying now by the tie they add line rental which I would need from someone. i don't have line rental at the moment.

Adrian

Desktop machine now powered by windows 7 pro 64bit , laptop by ubuntu

ALLPAY Wireless broadband
Standard User zyborg47
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Tue 14-May-13 01:05:14
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by RobertoS:
In reply to a post by zyborg47:
i watch Netflix and other online video, in fact it have replaced my normal TV watching, as I now don't have a licence.
Do you watch anything this way while it is being broadcast live - i.e. live relays?


Nope, so I don't need a TV licence. i don't watch much catch up Tv anyway, just Dr who and that is it. the rest is with Netflix.

Adrian

Desktop machine now powered by windows 7 pro 64bit , laptop by ubuntu

ALLPAY Wireless broadband
Standard User Chrysalis
(legend) Sat 18-May-13 18:06:29
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: Spud2003] [link to this post]
 
Whats killing them is now wholesale requires 12 month commitment so one of their selling points is trashed (short contracts) I expect all of them have been onto ofcom about that been anti competitive favouring the big boys (who typically had long contracts anyway) and that the big boys are loss leading or at least happy to operate on very slim profits. Plusnet I wouldnt class as a big boy but their owner has deep enough pockets so they can operate like one.

aaisp I feel are holding their own still, they seem to be adapting (they never did complete in mainstream market remember that) and also still managing to offer FTTC terms that are more friendly than the big boys such as £1 migraition fee on FTTC and less than 12 months contract. But of course they dont offer unlimited usage (unless you prepared to pay for it all in units) and their base pricing is higher, but in return its a more technical niche isp. however I do feel the likes of vivaciti, xilo etc. seem to offer little over what plusnet does. Other than the fact plusnet has a long thread on its own forums with peak time speed issues and a lagging profile system, which those isps may not have but the cheap unlimited on plusnet is just swallowing so many into it.

BT Infinity 2 Since Dec 2012
Standard User Chrysalis
(legend) Sat 18-May-13 18:14:45
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: vivaciti] [link to this post]
 
add a monthly contract option and I will give you a punt.

£45 for the unlimited 80/20. £8 extra per monthly customer to subsidise those that cancel early? worth trying?

BT Infinity 2 Since Dec 2012
Standard User RobertoS
(sensei) Sun 19-May-13 01:01:41
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: Chrysalis] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Chrysalis:
Whats killing them is now wholesale requires 12 month commitment
Openreach actually.

My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk | Domains,website and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - Plusnet UnLim Fibre (FTTC). Sync ~ 54.2/15.2Mbps @ 600m. - BQM

"Where talent is a dwarf, self-esteem is a giant." - Jean-Antoine Petit-Senn.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Allergy information: This post was manufactured in an environment where nuts are present. It may include traces of understatement, litotes and humour.
Standard User vivaciti
(knowledge is power) Mon 20-May-13 12:03:00
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: Chrysalis] [link to this post]
 
FTTC services cannot be ordered for less than 12 months.

www.vivaciti.net
Vivaciti Broadband
0800 0911797

Forum
Facebook
Standard User zyborg47
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Mon 20-May-13 20:15:34
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: Chrysalis] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Chrysalis:
add a monthly contract option and I will give you a punt.

£45 for the unlimited 80/20. £8 extra per monthly customer to subsidise those that cancel early? worth trying?


Monthly contract for FTTC? that is not going to happen. I know EE got a trial, but you have to be a mobile phone customer and after the trial you get put onto their ADSL service.


As been above, blame BT, be it openreach, wholesale or retail, they all the same company. Also blame our government.

Adrian

Desktop machine now powered by windows 7 pro 64bit , laptop by ubuntu

ALLPAY Wireless broadband
Standard User uno
(knowledge is power) Mon 20-May-13 20:28:21
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: zyborg47] [link to this post]
 
FTTC Self-Install will happen, much like when ADSL was engineer-only installation and then changed to self-install a year or two later (may be even longer).

The trials have been banded around for a while and seem to be making some actual progress now.

Matt

uno Broadband
t: 0808 221 8642
Official Maidenhead, Milton Keynes & Sheffield Speedtest.net Host
Standard User zyborg47
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Tue 21-May-13 10:55:04
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: uno] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by uno:
FTTC Self-Install will happen, much like when ADSL was engineer-only installation and then changed to self-install a year or two later (may be even longer).

The trials have been banded around for a while and seem to be making some actual progress now.

Matt


But to do that then surly they need to have combined routers and modems as it makes setting up a lot easier.

TBh, i prefer the faceplate on the socket instead of these stupid filters hanging off cables, the amount of time I caught one when cleaning the carpet and had to replace it. that is why I went back to a faceplate.

Would ADSL filters work with FTTC? not that i am planning to go to FTTc anytime soon

it seems like BT retail is not planning for combined routers as their latest HH4 is ADSL and wan only, no VDSL modem built in

Adrian

Desktop machine now powered by windows 7 pro 64bit , laptop by ubuntu

ALLPAY Wireless broadband
Standard User RobertoS
(sensei) Tue 21-May-13 15:06:35
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: zyborg47] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by zyborg47:
Would ADSL filters work with FTTC?
Apparently yes, some people have retained existing ADSL filtered faceplates, but some of the more techie people on here reckon they aren't quite as effective. On a self-install I'm sure a suitable filter will be supplied - the specifications for it are in SIN 498 along with the modem requirements.

My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk | Domains,website and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - Plusnet UnLim Fibre (FTTC). Sync ~ 54.2/15.2Mbps @ 600m. - BQM

"Where talent is a dwarf, self-esteem is a giant." - Jean-Antoine Petit-Senn.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Allergy information: This post was manufactured in an environment where nuts are present. It may include traces of understatement, litotes and humour.

Edited by RobertoS (Tue 21-May-13 15:33:43)

Standard User zyborg47
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Wed 22-May-13 08:13:12
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by RobertoS:
In reply to a post by zyborg47:
Would ADSL filters work with FTTC?
Apparently yes, some people have retained existing ADSL filtered faceplates, but some of the more techie people on here reckon they aren't quite as effective. On a self-install I'm sure a suitable filter will be supplied - the specifications for it are in SIN 498 along with the modem requirements.


The problem is the filter they will supply is stuck on the end of a cable, as I said above, I have broken a some of them when i been cleaning the carpet. the ones without a cable just sticks out and they are easy to knock as well.
that is why i like my faceplate, I presume when they start doing self install, someone will sell faceplates.

I a Bt openreach modem will still be sent to people on self install, certainly untl ISPs start sending out a combined unit.

Still, as I said, no plans to change to fibre at the moment,bt just in case.

Adrian

Desktop machine now powered by windows 7 pro 64bit , laptop by ubuntu

ALLPAY Wireless broadband
Standard User RobertoS
(sensei) Wed 22-May-13 14:49:10
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: zyborg47] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by zyborg47:
The problem is the filter they will supply is stuck on the end of a cable
You obviously have inside information from every ISP. Wow!

My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk | Domains,website and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - Plusnet UnLim Fibre (FTTC). Sync ~ 54.2/15.2Mbps @ 600m. - BQM

"Where talent is a dwarf, self-esteem is a giant." - Jean-Antoine Petit-Senn.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Allergy information: This post was manufactured in an environment where nuts are present. It may include traces of understatement, litotes and humour.
Standard User zyborg47
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Wed 22-May-13 22:29:57
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by RobertoS:
In reply to a post by zyborg47:
The problem is the filter they will supply is stuck on the end of a cable
You obviously have inside information from every ISP. Wow!


Ok, they will probably supply a filter that is stuck on the end of a cable. I am just going by what is supplied by ISps on ADSL.

I doubt they will supply a filter plate.

Adrian

Desktop machine now powered by windows 7 pro 64bit , laptop by ubuntu

ALLPAY Wireless broadband
Standard User RobertoS
(sensei) Wed 22-May-13 22:43:05
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: zyborg47] [link to this post]
 
It'll be interesting to find out.

One thing we can be sure of. If they supply an interstitial plate like the Openreach one, they will get a heck of a lot fewer support calls than if they supply dangly filters. Though how they would deal with a non-NTE5 premises is an issue.

A filtered faceplate such as yours would be beyond most punters to fit.

Maybe they'll pay Openreach to carry on as now. That will probably be the most cost-effective for them

My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk | Domains,website and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - Plusnet UnLim Fibre (FTTC). Sync ~ 54.2/15.2Mbps @ 600m. - BQM

"Where talent is a dwarf, self-esteem is a giant." - Jean-Antoine Petit-Senn.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Allergy information: This post was manufactured in an environment where nuts are present. It may include traces of understatement, litotes and humour.
Standard User XRaySpeX
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Thu 23-May-13 00:47:34
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by RobertoS:
One thing we can be sure of. If they supply an interstitial plate like the Openreach one, they will get a heck of a lot fewer support calls than if they supply dangly filters.
OTOH, the other thing we can be sure of is they will have to lose "Would you try swapping filters?" from their scripts.

Anyway I'm not so sure of that. I've had more trouble from BT filtered faceplates than all the danglers I've ever used. I know they're not the same as an interstitial plate but is essentially the same idea.

1999: Freeserve 48K Dial-Up => 2005: Wanadoo 1 Meg BB => 2007: Orange 2 Meg BB => 2008: Orange 8 Meg LLU => 2010: Orange 16 Meg LLU => 2011: Orange 20 Meg WBC - BQM
Administrator MrSaffron
(staff) Thu 23-May-13 11:27:57
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: zyborg47] [link to this post]
 
People are already selling the Interstitial filter faceplate

Andrew Ferguson, [email protected]
www.thinkbroadband.com - formerly known as ADSLguide.org.uk
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
Administrator MrSaffron
(staff) Thu 23-May-13 11:30:26
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: XRaySpeX] [link to this post]
 
http://www.coolwebhome.co.uk/faceplate/

Did this seen as already seeing people not realising that the first socket revealed is still filtered, obvious if you know about filters, but not to the average person and so far ISP support desks.

Andrew Ferguson, [email protected]
www.thinkbroadband.com - formerly known as ADSLguide.org.uk
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
Standard User zyborg47
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Sat 25-May-13 13:45:29
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by RobertoS:
It'll be interesting to find out.

One thing we can be sure of. If they supply an interstitial plate like the Openreach one, they will get a heck of a lot fewer support calls than if they supply dangly filters. Though how they would deal with a non-NTE5 premises is an issue.

A filtered faceplate such as yours would be beyond most punters to fit.

Maybe they'll pay Openreach to carry on as now. That will probably be the most cost-effective for them



Two screws, that is it, just unscrew, take the old plate off, put the new plate on and then screw it up.

I lost count of the amount of filters on cables I have damaged with the cleaner.

thankfully I don't have to rely on filters at all now, the poor phone socket is just sat there doing nothing, a shame I can't have it taken out to be honest.

Adrian

Desktop machine now powered by windows 7 pro 64bit , laptop by ubuntu

ALLPAY Wireless broadband
Standard User RobertoS
(sensei) Sat 25-May-13 15:40:13
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: zyborg47] [link to this post]
 
Not quite so simple if there are extensions. That's the point of the interstitial plate.

My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk | Domains,website and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - Plusnet UnLim Fibre (FTTC). Sync ~ 54.2/15.2Mbps @ 600m. - BQM

"Where talent is a dwarf, self-esteem is a giant." - Jean-Antoine Petit-Senn.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Allergy information: This post was manufactured in an environment where nuts are present. It may include traces of understatement, litotes and humour.
Standard User zyborg47
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Sun 26-May-13 21:23:26
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by RobertoS:
Not quite so simple if there are extensions. That's the point of the interstitial plate.


Oh yeah, forgot about extensions.

Thank goodness i don't have that problem. My Ethernet cable come down from the roof, down the outside wall and into a hole in my living room behind the Tv and then plonked into my router and that is it.

Adrian

Desktop machine now powered by windows 7 pro 64bit , laptop by ubuntu

ALLPAY Wireless broadband
Standard User Chrysalis
(legend) Mon 27-May-13 10:19:43
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
they both do but isps deal with wholesale not openreach.

BT Infinity 2 Since Dec 2012
Standard User Chrysalis
(legend) Mon 27-May-13 10:24:06
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
instead they will get support calls how to install it wink

I agree with zyborg its likely to be a dongle. A simple plugin device.

I did test my x1-fe dongle and it peformed no different to my FTTC install provided faceplate.

BT Infinity 2 Since Dec 2012
Standard User RobertoS
(sensei) Mon 27-May-13 22:54:40
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: Chrysalis] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Chrysalis:
they both do but isps deal with wholesale not openreach.
I assume the BTW 12-months is because of the OR one tongue. Anyway, how do you know there are no TalkTalk Business Wholesale FTTC resellers?

But this is a silly part of the overall discussion. I suggest we drop it.

My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk | Domains,website and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - Plusnet UnLim Fibre (FTTC). Sync ~ 54.2/15.2Mbps @ 600m. - BQM

"Where talent is a dwarf, self-esteem is a giant." - Jean-Antoine Petit-Senn.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Allergy information: This post was manufactured in an environment where nuts are present. It may include traces of understatement, litotes and humour.
Standard User Chrysalis
(legend) Tue 04-Jun-13 23:53:58
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
no problem, but I agree with your last post anyway smile

BT Infinity 2 Since Dec 2012
Standard User alotbit
(newbie) Tue 18-Jun-13 16:44:02
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: alotbit] [link to this post]
 
Have gone with Xilo for phone and fttc.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Fri 21-Jun-13 22:15:03
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: alotbit] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by alotbit:
Have gone with Xilo for phone and fttc.


Just out of interest, what is the cost?
Standard User alotbit
(newbie) Tue 25-Jun-13 15:55:17
Print Post

Re: Any smaller ISPs who can compete on FTTC?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Line rental is £10.50 + VAT per month and there is a £5 + VAT fee to transfer this over.

FTTC pricing is on their availability checker and has a £80 + VAT activation fee and 12 month contract.
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | >> (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to