> Outgoing customers who contest the amount owed will be delighted to let PN do the legwork
> to prove that it is a legitimate debt.
Ok... fair enough.. it will have some impact.
> That's a complete turnaround of the current scenario which puts the onus on David to take
> Goliath to court
Taking large companies to court is really not difficult.. I appreciate you've said before this is the perception and maybe that's something we need to address on the main site... i.e. internal complaint, ADR systems, court, etc.
> only a tiny minority of those who feel that they have been over-charged ever bother to do so.
Many people are all talk until it comes to the first solicitors letter at which point the buckle and do anything they are asked of including paying money.. I'm not sure if it's going to quite be as "I want my day in court" as you suggest... but yes it may change a bit. The ADR process should be even simpler in some ways. ISPA is pushing its members quite hard to get onto CISAS if they're not already members of OTELO..
> The 5-year tie-in via deferred payments for activation/modems is also being stopped by Ofcom.
I was discussing the MAC issue really.. I'm in two minds about defereed payments.. effectively what PN are saying is "we'll help you spready the setup cost".. but then again if this is compared to a bank loan you should be able to change provider and transfer the loan portion to them.. just like moving a mortgage
seb