User comments on ISPs
  >> PlusNet plc


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


These posts have been archived and can no longer be replied to or modified.
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | (show all)   Print Thread
ISP Representative chrisparr
(isp) Tue 19-Jun-07 14:33:10
Print Post

Additional Network Capacity


[link to this post]
 
We are pleased to announce that we have now activated the first segment of our sixth 622Mbps Central Pipe.

The new capacity has been activated in line with the current budget and in response to our recent Broadband Your Way product launch as well for projected growth in signups and to support existing customers moving to the new products.

When new capacity is added to the network, it takes time for the network to balance and for a representative proportion of the customer base to connect to the new segment. In order to speed up this process and help balance the platform to give the most benefit to customers, it may be necessary for us to temporarily disconnect a number of customers from the network. Should we take the decision to do this we will announce further details as a planned maintenance notice otherwise it may take up to a week for the new segment to be balanced.

Edited by chrisparr (Tue 19-Jun-07 14:33:25)

The above post has been made by an ISP REPRESENTATIVE (although not necessarily the ISP being discussed in the post).
Standard User bs0d
(committed) Tue 19-Jun-07 17:13:29
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: chrisparr] [link to this post]
 
A whole 2 hrs without a reply .... more bandwidth has to be a good thing ... long may it continue.

bs0d.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 19-Jun-07 17:57:20
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: chrisparr] [link to this post]
 
How does this affect/help those of us on the LLU (Tiscali) network? 2 or is it 3 segments have gone live over the last few months to improve capacity on the BT network, but I haven't seen any investment in capacity for those of us on the LLU side of the network.

What are plusnet's plans for the LLU component of the network? Most of the focus seems to be on the BT network, and I worry that those of us on LLU are being ignored to an extent.

Maybe my concerns are unjustified, but I would appreciate some reassurance.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 19-Jun-07 18:10:45
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Hi Snowwolf,

Our userbase on Tiscali is not growing as we are not placing any additional orders onto Tiscali's LLU service. In fact, due to natural churn caused by customers moving house or moving to a different ISP. As such we are not expanding our capacity on the Tiscali network. However, as our userbase on the BT Network continues to grow, we have continued to add extra capacity.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 19-Jun-07 18:59:32
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: chrisparr] [link to this post]
 
...and graphs now updated here :

http://www.plus.net/support/network_performance/broadband_packets_drop.shtml
Standard User h0tblack
(knowledge is power) Tue 19-Jun-07 20:41:25
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Have PlusNet officially given up on their LLU plans since bought by BT then? Are no new customers at all put onto Tiscali's LLU?
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 19-Jun-07 21:06:28
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: h0tblack] [link to this post]
 
Yes they have. A BT-owned ISP is not going to give business to rival local loop providers. There's already pretty fierce competition between BT and the rest in the most lucrative exchanges. And that's probably where most of the PN orders were going at the time too - for the biggest cost savings.
Standard User h0tblack
(knowledge is power) Tue 19-Jun-07 21:57:40
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Oh, I can completely understand why they wouldn't. I just hadn't heard that they definitely had until now, I must have missed the memo

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 19-Jun-07 22:18:04
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: h0tblack] [link to this post]
 
We haven't moved any customers to LLU in a long time now and there are no plans to restart activations/migrations, but on the other hand there are no plans for a mass migration back to IPStream.
Standard User wingco1
(knowledge is power) Tue 19-Jun-07 22:36:07
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
What is the current cost to any customer who wishes to return to IPStream?

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power."
Abraham Lincoln
16th president of US (1809 - 1865)
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 19-Jun-07 22:38:42
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: wingco1] [link to this post]
 
It's the cost of a normal activation -
Standard User wingco1
(knowledge is power) Tue 19-Jun-07 22:43:21
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Thanks Dave. I thought there was a mechanism in place to allow migration from LLU to IPStream, or was there a trail?.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power."
Abraham Lincoln
16th president of US (1809 - 1865)
Standard User h0tblack
(knowledge is power) Tue 19-Jun-07 22:45:12
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Understood Dave, thanks for the info.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 19-Jun-07 23:40:47
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: wingco1] [link to this post]
 
There is, it's now done via a MAC key but as it's a new IPStream activation BT charge the full activation fee rather than the migration fee that would apply if it was IPStream to IPStream.
Standard User channel
(committed) Wed 20-Jun-07 01:50:51
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: chrisparr] [link to this post]
 
Great news, Chris. Thanks for letting us know in such an open and transparent way.

If in future Plus Net decide to decommission a segment, will we be informed in similarly open and transparent terms?

Just asking because, for some reason, when PN last cut their bandwidth, it remained a secret between PN and PUG for quite a while before it was revealed here thanks to Columbo-like investigatory work.

It would be great to have a commitment that such an oversight won't happen in future.

PS: Before anyone gets upset, I fully recognise that last time you switched pipes off, Neil Armstrong said

"This is just a total non-event that is being blown out of all proportion for some bizarre reason. It's being spun as a 'story' by those in thinkbroadband forums who still want to wage a PR war against us despite not having been customers for well over 12 months."

and Mr Blobby said

"Yes I agree. I have just had my bashing and have decided those TB can sod off now as I am no longer going to bother. TB has gone to the dogs as far as I'm concerned. ",

but there were a number of factors which pointed to PN spin in the way in which they dealt with those announcements and understandable confusion among the customerbase. See the link below for a refresher.

http://usergroup.plus.net/forum/index.php/topic,3910.45.html

I presume that you wouldn't want that to happen again.

___________________________________
PLUS NET - The Shaping Of Things To Come
"If you don't like it here it's very simple for you to find another ISP."
....................Neil Armstrong
Head of Marketing, Plus Net plc
15 September 2005
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 20-Jun-07 10:03:10
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: channel] [link to this post]
 
There must be something wrong with people who keep tabs on post from years ago to keep dragging them up at every opportunity.
Standard User wingco1
(knowledge is power) Wed 20-Jun-07 10:08:58
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Thanks for the clarification Dave.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power."
Abraham Lincoln
16th president of US (1809 - 1865)
Standard User therioman
(knowledge is power) Wed 20-Jun-07 10:42:48
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Ignoring the "BT Owned" bit of it, the Tiscali migration was a mess and the reliability of Tiscali sucks badly, so any sensible ISP would kill it.
Standard User paul2002
(member) Wed 20-Jun-07 12:41:02
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: channel] [link to this post]
 
I hope we have an organisation that wouldn't consider doing it in secret again, but we will only have the answer if it ever happens. The way useage is going, unless there is a big push on LLU again or another technology, is it likely to happen?

Paul

Plus Net - maxDSL - premier....or whatever its called now
Draytek Vigor 280VG running 2.7_E38 firmware
Standard User channel
(committed) Wed 20-Jun-07 12:48:19
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
It was only six months ago, George. Not sure whether that is sufficient for you to reconsider your ill founded and ill intentioned remarks. Based on past performance, I suspect not.

___________________________________
PLUS NET - The Shaping Of Things To Come
"If you don't like it here it's very simple for you to find another ISP."
....................Neil Armstrong
Head of Marketing, Plus Net plc
15 September 2005
Standard User StAnLeH
(experienced) Wed 20-Jun-07 12:51:48
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: channel] [link to this post]
 
Channel, Let go, move on. Give them time and we will all see.

ZeN
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 20-Jun-07 13:08:54
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Another constructive post, well done, keep it up. Your posts are so well thought out, constructive, accurate and not personal, pity we can't have much more of these type. Excellent.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 20-Jun-07 13:09:58
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: paul2002] [link to this post]
 
"but we will only have the answer if it ever happens."

Perhaps a promise now might go a looooong way!
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 20-Jun-07 13:16:56
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
All a promise now will do is to give certain people a stick to beat PlusNet with in the future if they ever, for some reason, fail to keep the promise.
Standard User soundsystem
(knowledge is power) Wed 20-Jun-07 14:39:56
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
I think if everyone is honest, the amount of so called Plusnet Beatings, has significantly reduced.

Why?

Perhaps because Plusnet have finally accepted that they did do wrong and have made postive steps to rectify them.

If they ever repeat their mistakes,

1) They deserve the so called Beatings

2) They probably won't survive

I welcome all the changes that have had a postive reaction and experience for their endusers.

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 20-Jun-07 15:10:45
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: channel] [link to this post]
 
Six months, twelve months or years it's the PAST. Some of us move on and not live in the past to try to score points when there are none to score.
Standard User podster
(regular) Wed 20-Jun-07 15:24:16
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: soundsystem] [link to this post]
 
I can't agree with that.

What plusnet have done is the barest minimum they could get away with. They haven't even been bothered to answer the questions posed to them a month ago, preferring to dedicate their time to "oooh, look, a new cable" or TalkTalk's misdemeanours.
Standard User podster
(regular) Wed 20-Jun-07 15:25:47
Print Post

Congratulate plusnet


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
You're right. I think plusnet have gone at least 48 hours without screwing up. We can all agree that that is cause for celebration and congratulation.
Standard User soundsystem
(knowledge is power) Wed 20-Jun-07 15:27:03
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: podster] [link to this post]
 
12 months ago, they would not have done anything.

Standard User paul2002
(member) Wed 20-Jun-07 17:58:00
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: podster] [link to this post]
 
but how do we know if they haven't answered the questions, you are assuming the negative, I'm assuming they have done more than the minimum, others on here may assume they have gone over everything. All we are doing is speculating based on little or no information.

Paul

Plus Net - maxDSL - premier....or whatever its called now
Draytek Vigor 280VG running 2.7_E38 firmware
Standard User onlyme2
(committed) Wed 20-Jun-07 18:02:49
Print Post

Re: Congratulate plusnet


[re: podster] [link to this post]
 
Good grief ..you had some spam . People would think you suffered a life and death issue by the way you go on.

Force9 - DSL Zone Tests
http://www.dslzoneuk.net/speedtest/speedtest.php?id=396685
http://www.dslzoneuk.net/speedtest/speedtest.php?id=395883
28 Nov 2006, 00:16 Force9 8128 7008
18 Nov 2006, 10:45 Force9 8128 6954
17 Nov 2006, 11:20 Force9 8128 7028
15 Nov 2006, 15:17 Force9 8128 6971
Standard User podster
(regular) Wed 20-Jun-07 21:33:36
Print Post

Re: Additional Network Capacity


[re: paul2002] [link to this post]
 
In reply to:

All we are doing is speculating based on little or no information



I'm assuming they've done all they've said and no more. And they've said [censored] all.
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to