18 month at £6 a month for basic broadband, or £16/£20 a month for unlimited (which apparently actually means unlimited), who can actually match it without forcing you to take a phone or tv package?
Mobile phone contracts are 12 or 18 months (or longer), often the longer you choose the better the deal, it's the same here isnt it. Margins are squeezed, recouping "free" hardware costs takes longer, etc.
How many times would an issue with broadband actually be the ISP's fault? Isnt it much more likely to be a problem with BT, etc?
I'm sure if you want to leave because you have a genuine problem that is PN's fault and not just because you want to save a few ££ each month, PN would probably (on a case by case basis) look at this (and no, I'm not a PN person, I'm just speaking as someone who would consider this common sense and good customer service).
Lets face it, Joe Public is (in the main), not the kind of person who cares about who they get their broadband from, they just want a reliable and good service. I've had very very few problems with my broadband, and when I have it's not been PN's fault. My only complaint about PN is they have to treat everyone as a dumb user and go through the scripts, and most of us on here will be far from dumb users.
Anyway, I've been with PN for over 5 years now, and on the one occasion I was tempted to move ISP's they got me to stay, and I'm 95% certain I'm going to sign up for the unlimited package now for 18 months and save a few quid each month.
Anyway, thought I'd show some support for PN, so now, as the Human Torch would say "Flame On"....
FINALLY managed to get ADSL on 4th November 2003!!!!!!! HURRAR!!!!!!!!



Pages in this thread:
Print Thread
fig