In reply to:

---

Are you trying to say that sometimes the posters are part of the problem then?

---

Um, is the Pope a Catholic??? There are some things that are so obvious to all that they just don't need saying!

an accurate post, as ever with yourself...

I am often too emotive... and should take more time in responding to posts.. probably not alone in this.

however are you sharing the opinion that the exclusion is an act of unneccessary censorship, and an action done to aid plusnet, to assume so disrepects the moderation here in a major and unacceptable way... a tough but important job where perceived errors in judgement are labelled in a haenous way.

Edited by deleted (Thu 10-May-07 15:29:24)

I think this is a most unfortunate step to take. In my opinion it will not address the perceived problems with the culture on this forum, and is not this site's finest hour.

However, TBB does not belong to me, and it is the right of the mods to operate however they choose.

>however are you sharing the opinion that the exclusion is an act of unneccessary censorship

Very much so.

>and an action done to aid plusnet, to assume so disrepects the moderation here in a major and unacceptable way...

I haven't assumed that at all (in fact I wrote a post earlier detailing as much). You have made that assumption on my behalf.

I was not assuming, but asking a question....

I guess you have your answer then.

I just try not to assume too much..

In reply to:

---

I know there are other definitions which refer to simply a ficticious statement etc.

---

But you chose to use the one which adds weight to your argument.

In reply to:

---

but the general perception of a lie is something that is intended, not a mistake.

---

That is your opinion, it is not a statement of truth.

Therefore your decision to ban Simon was made on an opinion, and not a factual basis.


edit: spelling

Edited by wingco1 (Thu 10-May-07 17:31:04)

In reply to:

---

I think PN needed a kick up the backside last year and it truly got it.. pr100 was one of those who helped give it that.

---

Do you really think that the postings here by an ex-customer really made PlusNet change? Do you not think it more likely that the successful sale to BT and the exit of the people at the top allowed PlusNet to move back towards where it used to be?

In reply to:

---

I always aimed at improving the service the customer was getting with PN

---

The problem is that for some of us it is not possible to improve the service that we are getting from PlusNet. For one I get the speed that I need whenever I need it for a price that I am willing to pay, and never reach my allocated bandwidth.

I know that is a bit of an "I'm all right Jack" attitude, and my demands on the Internet are much less than some others, but there are plenty like me for whom your attempt to help do not seem like that at all. If it ain't broke then you telling me how to fix it is pointless.