In reply to:

---

your just fuelling the hate against you

---

Hate ? get a grip.

The measures taken, including having this flypaper thread, do appear to be benefiting the usability of the forum. If it took a ban to stop the incessant iterative re-examination of something the Plusnet allegedly said or did 18 months ago then I would support such a ban.

Oh dear, it seems pr100 is now getting 'blamed for/suspected of' Plusnet's 'leaked address' spam problem over on PUG in relation to his suspension on TBB:

Link

"<Very suspicious mind>
There is someone who posts in another place who has made it clear that they have a mole inside Plusnet. There was a happening earlier this week regarding this person. Coincidence?
</Very suspicious mind>" [jelv1]

I believe this is an extremely serious allegation. He also adds when told not to don his tinfoil hat:

Link

"I wasn't joking - it is obvious there has been a serious security breach."

It seems pr100 is shouldering the blame for a lot of things...

Perhaps he could teach some others a few lessons.

Edited by deleted (Mon 14-May-07 10:22:50)

What do you expect!

Easier to blame Simon that to think it's another cockup by their beloved PlusNet!

Edited by deleted (Mon 14-May-07 10:22:17)

By repeating such a silly allegation here, what exactly are you guys hoping to achieve? Especially given the nature of what is being reported, I think every possibility is worth suggesting and ruling out, but there is just no need for people to use this as an excuse to continue existing witch-hunts from either side of the fence.

Can we drop this now, and perhaps, between us demonstrate some maturity at a time when what matters most is figuring out what exactly has happened so we can make sure it's dealt with in an appropriate manner as quickly as possible. At this stage, any diversion from that task is simply unhelpful.

Ian

>By repeating such a silly allegation here, what exactly are you guys hoping to achieve?

Err I never repeated it, I commented on it just like you have!



>At this stage, any diversion from that task is simply unhelpful.


You chose to be diverted by posting and reading this thread.

Edited by deleted (Mon 14-May-07 10:37:11)

Your usual constructivity....

on a more serious note

if PR is being mentioned in the same breadth as the email problem, then that is the same juvenile paranoia as has been exhibited earlier in this topic, albeit more serious. I would trust that the first allegation here would meet with a similar or more serious exclusion from TBB.

In reply to:

---

By repeating such a silly allegation here, what exactly are you guys hoping to achieve?

---

Whether it is a 'silly' allegation is not for you to judge, if it was insinuated that you had leaked the spammed addresses how would you feel?

I guess pr100 is reading this thread which is why I posted it here, let him be the judge of whether it is silly or not, I am merely raising his awareness of potentially defamatory comments being made about him on a public forum.

"By repeating such a silly allegation here,"

When will you be taking steps to remove that smear from the PUG forums, then, Ian?

>Your usual constructivity....

Which is a damn sight better than yours!

I made a comment on something posted on here that someone has commented of that it could have been Simon that somehow got this to happen.

My view is someone that is so quick to think is could be Simon over a PlusNet error must be one hell of a Fanboy.

1st part of reply was directed at you...

2nd part was definitely not... in case there is any confusion.

Likely cause of Problem

1) PN Problem
2) PN Problem
3) PN Problem
etc.
...
....
1000000000000220201201010) PR100

Edited by deleted (Mon 14-May-07 10:48:59)