1.5Tb would be plenty for me... would be interesting to see if the 250/250 held up well though... actually saying that all the other packages look like they need some hell of a network to cope...

and considering that Hyperoptic is considerably smaller coverage than KC and they have some congestion like issues (last I heard) and I believe that BT isn't available in these parts so thats a busy network...

However I may be wrong, it could be quiet a network...

Seems fine here :

Andrew

I get a failure on Vista running IE9. using Wifi I will run wired in a few minutes

Works OK on the old test but fails with
"Welcome to the new version of the thinkbroadband speed test.

�� We encountered a problem

Error Code: 4134

Check you have an Internet connection and try again

Now tried wired but still fails but with error 4132 now, Old test still works.

Now tested using firefox and works correctly. So looks like IE9 failure. Similar results to Flash test on IE9

Edited by kitcat (Tue 08-Sep-15 22:25:55)

ie9 supports html5?

It does and tester normally works, but tweaks to support IE9 may have confused the browser.

In reply to a post by mlmclaren:

1.5Tb would be plenty for me... would be interesting to see if the 250/250 held up well though... actually saying that all the other packages look like they need some hell of a network to cope...

and considering that Hyperoptic is considerably smaller coverage than KC and they have some congestion like issues (last I heard) and I believe that BT isn't available in these parts so thats a busy network...

However I may be wrong, it could be quiet a network...

You are right the reason KC exists is because there is no BT presence in Hull, Never has been, Probably never will be.

Andrew

Test one worked tonight but didn't appear to run test 2. Download and Upload are upside down on the graphs.

MS IE9 - second person to report issues with the SSL version

http://www.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest/results.html...

Was this the first time? I don't understand the upside down comment

Just tried the test again using IE11 for a change but didn't get far this time:-

http://s11.postimg.org/nvdsvcfqb/tbb_error_code_usin...

EDIT > Just tried the test again using FF 40.0.3 and no problems at all.

Edited by Apprentice (Wed 09-Sep-15 21:53:04)

In reply to a post by mlmclaren:

Damn... I thought I could of topped it using EE... Oh well...

I need to move to Kingston by the looks of it!

KCom cover Hull and surrounds so belay that thought.