When you say you can't make or receive calls, do you regard that as a fault, or by choice, or is that a restriction the account holder requested be in place?
Otherwise the general case for landlines and telephones is that no-one needs permission or authorisation, or even foreknowledge of who you are to call your number, just like no-one needs permission or authorisation to put something in the post with your address.
Therefore it would not normally be a security breach.
As regards autodiallers, there are acts covering conditions for when that activity may be unlawful but even then is considered the fault of the organisation making the calls rather than which telephony provider you happen to have your phone number with.
If you don't speak first, many autodiallers will hang up before starting playback, because they are waiting to see if they get a voice, a fax tone or other signal (engaged, out of service, unobtainable). Official advice is that a genuine caller will still speak first, even if slightly surprised by silence when picking up.
As regards any unwanted call yes you can just hang up or put the phone down for a few minutes before returning later to hang up.
For the "suspicious activity on your internet" you can play with them if you wish.
My current favourite is to ask:
"… oh that is indeed concerning. Please tell me which computer is causing the problem?"
> "erm … (confused noises)?"
"Yes - can you tell me the hostname so we can check on the one affected?"
> "(muffled chatter)"
prlzx on Zen: FTTC (VDSL) at ~40Mbps / 10Mbps
with IP4/6 (no v6? - not true Internet)