Having recently moved home, I�ve had to switch from a cable to ADSL broadband service (now via BT).
On first connection and for a couple of weeks, I was getting download speeds from 7 to 10Mb/s (despite the service being rated at 8Mb/s max, and BT saying my line is capable of up to 7Mb/s max). This has now dropped to a more consistent 1.6Mb/s. I�ve naturally complained to BT, and their response is that I need to leave my router switched on all the time. At the exchange end, the line is constantly monitored to deliver the highest possible line speed and is modified dynamically. By leaving the router switched off, the exchange assumes there is a problem and automatically drops the speed to a much lower speed.
I can�t believe for one moment that is the true case, surely when the switch is first powered on it will negotiate line speed starting with what is the highest possible for the service provided by the technology, and drop the speed dependent on errors received/transmitted, signal attenuation etc. It can�t seriously be the case that you have to keep a device constantly powered up just to maintain your line speed? What about holidays etc. when you�re away for a couple of weeks or whatever and you would prefer to have everything switched off for peace of mind?
Does anyone have a sound technical explanation why a router should always be powered up in order to maintain (a maximum possible) line speed? I�ve never come across this one before.



Print Thread
nsd3