I suppose it would be needlessly expensive and fundamentally poor judgment to pursue something like this in court , claiming that it would constitute ‘criminal damage’ is pure hyperbole, (when it comes to something as trivial as the location of an ONT ) , the consent enduring through change of ownership is pretty much common practice, but someone removing something like that ( which was entirely for that consumers benefit ) is not worth the effort to pursue legally, even if there was consent for it being there.
It is somewhat different to ( for example) a landowner purchasing land that has a cell site legally sited , and running a JCB through it , simply because they disagreed with its placement , obviously these things should be pointed out when purchasing , that would be a prima facie case of criminal damage
TBH , I’m sure there have been some posts on here , from customers of some Alt Nets asked to sign agreements that specifically disallow the customer from ever asking for the equipment removal
I know on new builds with an Openreach ONT fitted, that the contract with the developer that allowed for its ONT provision, requires the developer to make it a contractual condition of purchase when they sell the plot, but I doubt a conveyance solicitor would bother pointing something as trivial out
Edited by Iniltous (Sat 08-Oct-22 15:20:49)