|
|
|
Richard Branson's Virgin Media are making a big noise about their petition campaign
"Stop the Broadband Con".
It says ISP's should stop using phrases like " .... up to xxx Mbits " in their advertising and be more open & honest about the speeds their customers really achieve.
I think this is an admirable standpoint bearing in mind some of my previous experiences with a certain un-named national telco.
However I think Mr Branson should really get his own house into order before he starts picking on others.
I pay VM a nice fat sum each month which includes the cost of my 50 Mbit service
and yet I only get around 18 Mbits.
I get the same, any time of the day, regardless of any downloading Ive done and I get similar results from a number of different speed testers.
Mr Branson: Haven't you ever heard that people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones ?
|
|
|
|
Have you raised a support call? VM will readily acknowledge that 18Mb is not acceptable for a 50Mb service - they will either fix it or downgrade your package.
|
|
|
|
I think VM are pushing this because they know that their average speeds way closer to the 'up to' speeds than most other ISPs - kinda easy to shout about it when your service is less distance limited and therefore doesn't see the averages pulled down by the geography :-/
Not sure what kinda of diags you've done so please excuse me if it's old ground - Which router are you using?
I had a WRT54G running Tomato and found my 50Mb crapped out at 35-ish Mb....until testing revealed it was the router limiting my throughput.
Also, have you tried more than 1 computer? I've seen duff NIC drivers limiting speed before too.
|
|
Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.
|
|
|
sorry had to comment on this.
what is the basis of your claims?
you mean they may give a fix date half a year away and then fail to fix it.
now he could downgrade, but if only getting 18mbit on 50mbit then I expect he would only get 4-6meg on 20mbit as he loses the bonded downstream channels.
|
|
|
|
Just what I was thinking!
|
|
|
Depends on why he gets 18Mbps. If it's an oversubscribed area then your suggested outcome may well be correct but if there is a power level or noise ingress problem it could be sorted in a week or two.
The VM support forums is a good place to start - not least because there are a couple of stickies giving decent info on doing a quick self check on the modem stats and you don'y have to deal with the abysmal TS over the phone which often leads to a follow on call to the Samaritans
If you can't fix it with a hammer you've got an electrical problem.
|
|
|
In general cable is faster and more consistent than ADSL.
But then again I only get 8 odd on my 10G line.
---
Keef- Dartford Kent UK
VirginMedia 10M
[img]http://www.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest/button/12943...[/img]
Previously - Crosswinds, IC24, FreeOnlineNet, X-Stream, Totalise, Freeserve, Force9, TescoNet, AOL, Freenetname, NTL, Pipex, E7
===========
|
|
|
|
I dont know about consistent but would agree has a higher average speed. Once sky have FTTC tho they will blow cable away for average speeds as sky have a backhaul that can cope.
|
|
|
Looking back over my speedtest results on here; it does seem fairly consistent,
Perhaps it's just in my area?
---
Keef- Dartford Kent UK - VirginMedia 10M

Previously - Crosswinds, IC24, FreeOnlineNet, X-Stream, Totalise, Freeserve,
Force9, TescoNet, AOL, Freenetname, NTL, Pipex, E7
===========
|
|
|
|
I must admit I get bad results from the thinkbroadband tester. speedtester.net last night was giving a result of 50.2Mb/s but here was giving around 8.5Mb/s.
Ian
|