Technical Discussion
  >> VoIP (e.g. BT Digital Voice, Sky Internet Calls, etc.)


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


  Print Thread
Standard User MHC
(sensei) Mon 06-Jan-25 18:23:48
Print Post

BT CVE


[link to this post]
 
I currently have BT FTTP - Business with all the add-ons and perfectly happy with it. The voice side (Cloud Voice Express) - not so, as it was expensive.

My plan, for the current renewal was to keep FTTP at 500/70 and drop CVE before reclaiming the number through a port to my VoIP provider and paying a monthly rental to them. During a call earlier today I put my plan to BT - who had already offered a good discount on just FTTP and was offered £1/month for the VoIP/CVE -which is much the same as my normal provider.

The number is rarely used but some key contacts refuse to change so I could not afford to lose it - and talking to a contact I have, I was told that sometimes it proves impossible to Port between BTs CVE and some thrid parties.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

M H C


taurus excreta cerebrum vincit
Standard User Pheasant
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Mon 06-Jan-25 19:05:35
Print Post

Re: BT CVE


[re: MHC] [link to this post]
 
I really hate it when you say to a supplier that you're leaving and they throw you an exceptional rate, which they could have offered at any point.

Conversely at the start of a contract, its all teeth sucking and "that's the best we can do"

🤬
Standard User MHC
(sensei) Mon 06-Jan-25 19:42:48
Print Post

Re: BT CVE


[re: Pheasant] [link to this post]
 
I get you point on it howver I got the feeling that he was asking someone in the background for approval - the offer was already good on both FTTP and voice and I may have stayed without it as I would have porting charges to pay.

And it makes it easier for me!


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

M H C


taurus excreta cerebrum vincit


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User hunnymonster
(fountain of knowledge) Wed 08-Jan-25 09:02:19
Print Post

Re: BT CVE


[re: Pheasant] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Pheasant:
I really hate it when you say to a supplier that you're leaving and they throw you an exceptional rate, which they could have offered at any point.


That's when I typically say something along the lines of "I don't deal with suppliers that have proved to be not entirely honest with me", add them to my "faeces list" & move on.

Netgear have been there since 1998.
Standard User Thaumaturge
(member) Wed 08-Jan-25 09:16:31
Print Post

Re: BT CVE


[re: hunnymonster] [link to this post]
 
What did Netgear do to you in 1998 that has caused them to be ostracised for 26 years? My LAN is run by a GS308 (unmanaged) switch which was cheap (<£20) and just works. Bought to replace an older Netgear 100M switch which also just worked.
Standard User Pheasant
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Wed 08-Jan-25 12:20:22
Print Post

Re: BT CVE


[re: Thaumaturge] [link to this post]
 
Indeed. That’s longer than many ‘life sentence’ jail terms! What did they do I wonder…?
Standard User hunnymonster
(fountain of knowledge) Wed 08-Jan-25 15:32:38
Print Post

Re: BT CVE


[re: Pheasant] [link to this post]
 
The short version is that I had a Netgear wireless access point advertised as 802.11b/g compatible (call it a £50 purchase) that apparently did not work with the Intel-based chipset the (£1K) laptop that was also 802.11b/g compatible and worked 100% reliably with the other APs I'd tried it with (belonging to friends/family/work)- even Netgear's own support docs said the answer is to call Netgear to have them replace the AP...

A workmate had exactly the same setup & experience - him in Canada, me in UK.

Netgear (Europe) support answer: buy another piece of Netgear hardware - a USB WLAN NIC - and would not budge.
Netgear (North America) support answer: we shall send you a replacement v2 router FOC.

I'd still rather not have it than have a Netgear.
  Print Thread

Jump to