You hit the nail on the head. "It depends what you want at the end of the day."
Entanet cater for heavy users, and have to throttle. The method they use seems to be the best there is, and the effect is small, but all Tony is saying is they
DO throttle. Fact. The users are happy with it. Fine. But when a poster asks for a non-throttling ISP it is not fair to the poster for Enta re-sellers, never mind users, to deny the Enta ALT (throttle). It is up to the asker to decide if the ALT is acceptable - for most it will be.
Newnet price structure deters heavy users as you say. For the non-heavy users they are cheaper and better than Enta because by not having the heavy users they do not need to throttle, or lose packets! My IP Profile is 4500, my speeds vary from 4200 best to 3800/3900 typical to 3200 minimum. I doubt if Enta would give me that - at 50% higher price.