General Discussion
  >> Which ISP?


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | >> (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sat 14-Jul-12 18:51:09
Print Post

Gaming ISP


[link to this post]
 
I am currently with PlusNet who I actually hate as the "pro add on" which is meant to "guarantee low latency) does nothing. Just wondering if I should upgrade to PlusNet FTTC as it might lower my ping? (30ms at the min)

Another option is switching to another ISP like Be or O2 as I hear they are very good for gaming. Anything around £30 a month is fine

1.2km from exchange.
Standard User vivaciti
(knowledge is power) Sat 14-Jul-12 18:55:52
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Hi,
If you post back your line stats a link to your exchange then it will be easier for people to advise you.

www.vivaciti.net
Vivaciti Broadband
0800 0911797

Forum
Facebook
Standard User Zadeks
(experienced) Sat 14-Jul-12 19:53:29
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
30ms is low. It sounds like you're interleaved.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sat 14-Jul-12 20:05:08
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
as an FPS gamer myself, I know there is nothing wrong with a ping of 30 ms. The average reaction time is 215 milliseconds so lower ping won't help you. As long as your packet loss is minimal 30 ms is fine and this is what the profiling on plusnet is supposed to do. Practice more.
Standard User RobertoS
(sensei) Sun 15-Jul-12 01:24:11
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
?
Surely if two people with 215ms reaction time are competing with each other, the one with 15ms latency will do better than the one with 30ms latency?

My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk
My domains,website and mail hosting - Tsohost. Internet connection - Plusnet Value Fibre FTTC 80/20 trial.

"Where talent is a dwarf, self-esteem is a giant." - Jean-Antoine Petit-Senn.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 15-Jul-12 09:56:57
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by RobertoS:
?
Surely if two people with 215ms reaction time are competing with each other, the one with 15ms latency will do better than the one with 30ms latency?
in a gun on gun battle that 15ms could be the difference between winning or losing . every single ms saved in FPS is a possible advantage .
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 15-Jul-12 11:56:46
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
It will indeed make a difference.

Anyway, if I switch to FTTC would this give me a lower ping do you think? Thanks smile

Edited by deleted (Sun 15-Jul-12 11:59:56)

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 15-Jul-12 11:57:22
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: Zadeks] [link to this post]
 
Hey, thanks for the reply. I am on fastpath
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 15-Jul-12 13:08:54
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Game servers don't work like that. For each connection they work out an average between all players and create sync compensations to bring all players in line.

Latency for gamers only becomes an issue when it's variable. The server takes time to adjust the sync as it uses an average.

My VM connection can range from 25ms to 85ms from one moment to the next so is not much good for online gaming.

My Be connection is sub 20ms with little or no fluctuation so is ideal for gaming.
Standard User Zadeks
(experienced) Sun 15-Jul-12 13:33:20
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Location?
Standard User tommy45
(knowledge is power) Sun 15-Jul-12 13:57:51
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
There are a lot of variables some people will see a lower ping time than others because of their location . then there is wireless vs wired, if a serious gamer you will always use wired as wireless will add to ping times & cause other unwanted behavior
The peering used and the internal routing can also impact the latency, to overseas locations mainly , But switching to a FTTC based product may produce higher response times as FTTC connections are subject to DLM and bt profiling which has the ability to switch you from fast path to interleave automatically , But as the peering would be different if with another isp, then there maybe no difference or there could a significant one (big increase)

Standard User tommy45
(knowledge is power) Sun 15-Jul-12 14:02:47
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
If within the uk using my BE connection the ping is quite steady but if say connecting to Ubisoft in Canada it shows a alarming amount of fluctuation at times, as for the average ping times the only sub 10ms ping i see is to the exchange equipment be gateway but I'm in the north of this wonderful broken over populated country

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 15-Jul-12 14:21:15
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: Zadeks] [link to this post]
 
I am in Northern Ireland
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 15-Jul-12 14:22:01
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Do you think I should go with Be?
Standard User Zadeks
(experienced) Sun 15-Jul-12 16:02:10
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
30ms seems reasonable.
Standard User tommy45
(knowledge is power) Sun 15-Jul-12 17:45:07
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by steek:
Do you think I should go with Be?
I don't, as i'm pretty sure that 02/BE Retail customers in northern Ireland have been complaining about their quality of service ping, packet loss ect , not too long ago, The best way if your exchange has BE/02 enabled would be to try a be /O2wholesale product via one of the many reseller ISP's such as Vivaciti,or Xilo ,Aquiss/ADSL24 plus others too as are as i know all use different peering and other things that could influence throughput/sync rate and latency , so although it's got an 02 badge it will give a very different level of performance and according to those who subscribe to the wholesale products report positively (well those that post on here and other places ) ,
But the main difference being that the contract would be 1 month so if it was not to your satisfaction easy to switch provider again

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 15-Jul-12 18:03:34
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: tommy45] [link to this post]
 
Which one would you recommend?
Standard User techguy
(committed) Sun 15-Jul-12 19:03:04
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: vivaciti] [link to this post]
 
Whats the voice condition like on the line? Do you hear any crackling?

Connect a wired phone to the line and dial 17070 and select option 2 for a quiet line test, all you should hear is a small hiss, if you hear a crackle report a voice fault to your landline provider (don't mention broadband)

Virgin (ADSL) => Namesco => Newnet => O2 => Plusnet => Zen => Newnet => Zen Lite 8000
Note: I don't lay turf for anyone. astro or otherwise, all views and opinions expressed are my own based on experience.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 16-Jul-12 12:48:14
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
I will tell you from experience, That you do not want a 25ms ping or below for online gaming on console, I have been playing since the release of cod4 on consoles, I've never had above a 25ms ping connection, Directly connected to my exchange at 200m, I've been in 2 different properties on my estate and the ping was the same in both properties, I've had several isp's over the years, And every single game i've played, COD4, WAW, MW2, Blackops, MW3, BFBC2, MOH, BF3, Uncharted, Has very bad lag compensation problems, I'm always out of sync with players, Rediculous hitmarkers, people taking half a magazine to kill them, Players ahead of you by 1,2,3 seconds.
Anonymous
(Unregistered)Mon 16-Jul-12 13:21:00
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
The modern warfare games have horrible lag compensation I honestly cant understand how they are so popular when they have so many problems on consoles.

I have been with BE at two different property's in Edinburgh and have not really had any problems with them online. I currently have a virgin FTTC connection as well and it is just horrible for playing on live.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Fri 20-Jul-12 22:46:17
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: Anonymous] [link to this post]
 
I use Zen Internet and now get 8ms pings on FTTC. Previously on their ADSL the pings were about 15ms. Both have very stable low pings at any time of the day. This is to UK servers.

Some modern games use unnatural network compensation such as BF3 or COD4 etc. Having a low ping is a benefit but you get some strange delayed correction affects. Games such as CS , BF2 and BF2142 don't do this and so play very well with a low ping.

Having a ping of 100ms or more will cause you problems and more experienced gamers will notice a ping of 50ms or more. Reaction time is not just about how fast you can move your fingers but also how fast your ears, eyes and brain react to on screen action. You don't move you fingers everytime something happens on the screen wink
Standard User tommy45
(knowledge is power) Sat 21-Jul-12 01:20:46
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Thing is with all FTTC based products great if you are lucky enough to stay on fast path , but DLM could change that at any given time sometimes without a good reason ,

Standard User XRaySpeX
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Sat 21-Jul-12 11:29:18
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: tommy45] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by tommy45:
Thing is with all FTTC based products great if you are lucky enough to stay on fast path , but DLM could change that at any given time sometimes without a good reason,
Same with BT WBC based products!

1999: Freeserve 48K Dial-Up => 2005: Wanadoo 1 Meg BB => 2007: Orange 2 Meg BB => 2008: Orange 8 Meg LLU => 2010: Orange 16 Meg LLU => 2011: Orange 19 Meg WBC
Standard User jchamier
(knowledge is power) Mon 23-Jul-12 19:37:51
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: tommy45] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by tommy45:
Thing is with all FTTC based products great if you are lucky enough to stay on fast path , but DLM could change that at any given time sometimes without a good reason ,


and nobody said FTTC interleaved was much different to fast path!

James be* pro (16.8 / 1.2 sync) - BQM - FTTC cab installed 18-jun-2012 - not yet active - est 44.6 / 6.5
Anonymous
(Unregistered)Thu 26-Jul-12 21:27:48
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Hang on, you are wanting to move over a 30ms ping? That's a great ping. Plusnet are great for gaming tbh. I never have any problems with them and I play quite a few FPS and MORPGS etc.

I think you think you know more than you actually know. :/
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 26-Jul-12 21:34:45
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
I used to play on servers in the USA where the local players had sub 100 pings and mine was 300 (dialup days) . Didn't stop me from consistently coming top of the frag tables and that is a massive latency difference compared to 30 and 15.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sat 28-Jul-12 15:44:36
Print Post

Re: Gaming ISP


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
usually get about 9 ms, today it is 10, seems to work well smile
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | >> (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to