|
|
Currently running win 10 32 bit and 64 bit on my system as a dual boot(see specs). I currently have 4gb of memory installed and my p35 board will take 8gb ram max.
I am using the 32 bit as main boot but could install my programs on the 64 bit os and install 8gb for £89, is it worth it? I don't use any memory hungry programs and have an SSD on both partitions, so is the 8gb upgrade worth it?
|
|
|
You could use Resource Monitor to see how many hard (page) faults you are getting. You will always get some no matter how much memory you have but if you are getting a lot, you need more memory. On Win 7, the quickest way to start the Resource Monitor is Start/Run and then type "resource monitor" (I don't have Win 10).
Remember that since you are using an SSD and the page file is on the SSD, any paging will impact the lifespan of the SSD.
I would add more memory and switch to 64-bit, but make sure that you can find 64-bit drivers for your hardware. I have 12GB and can run without a page file (although Windows Update will sometimes decide to create one for me).
Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him. -- Groucho Marx
Edited by micksharpe (Tue 19-Jan-16 21:02:46)
|
|
|
I already have 64 bit setup and running. I can only see faults/sec in memory of resource monitor and thats zero with just one blip. 32 bit wont benefit from another 4gb but 64 bit would. I can always keep 32 bit spare because there are no drivers for my microscope or belkin video digitiser but I only use them once in a while.
Am I reading the resource monitor faults graph right?
|
|
Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.
|
|
|
I'm no expert but if you're not seeing many page faults and performance is OK, then there's no need to do anything. Extra memory will be allocated to the disk cache, but since you're using an SSD...
Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him. -- Groucho Marx
|
|
|
I am beginning to think it may be a pointless excersize as I only use the machine for email, documents, printing and web browsing. I found some cheaper memory £60 for 4 2gb sticks of ddr2 800 at local pc shop but no gurantee of it being compatible whereas the £90 is from crucial.com and they gurantee compatability with my motherboard.
|
|
|
I am beginning to think it may be a pointless excersize as I only use the machine for email, documents, printing and web browsing. I found some cheaper memory £60 for 4 2gb sticks of ddr2 800 at local pc shop but no gurantee of it being compatible whereas the £90 is from crucial.com and they gurantee compatability with my motherboard.
If that is all you are using your computer for and it is not having any problems with running stuff, which with 4GB it should be fine, then no point in spending money on more memory.
Unless you are into games, photo, video editing or have a load of software opened at the same time then you computer will be fine.
Adrian
Desktop machine now powered by windows 8.1 pro 64bit, no dreaded metro, laptop by Linux
Plusnet FTTC
|
|
|
|
It is surprising how well Win 10 will run on a 2GB tablet device - given that, the race for more memory for "normal" uses seems to have paused.
|
|
|
I'm on W7 64bit with 3Gb of RAM on a SATA HDD. No issues when editing video. I do use an external HD to save the files as my bottleneck is the writing of the new file.
With your SSD and basic use then you shouldn't need any extra RAM.
Was Eclipse Home Option 1, VM 2Mb & O2 Standard
Now Utility Warehouse (up to 16mbps) via Talk Talk
|
|
|
Thanks for the replies, I very rarely have more than 3 programs open at a time. Photoshop Express does me for photo correction. I dont game so looks like the consensus is 4gb is adequate for my needs, thanks again for saving me £60-90.
|
|
|
It is surprising how well Win 10 will run on a 2GB tablet device - given that, the race for more memory for "normal" uses seems to have paused.
I have had Windows 8.1 running on a 1GB celeron laptop and it worked ok, not my laptop. It have now been updated to 2GB, and to be honest there is no real difference in use.
Still looking at updating it to Windows 10, they are not too sure if they want to and I have not really got the time to do it at the moment anyway.
Adrian
Desktop machine now powered by windows 8.1 pro 64bit, no dreaded metro, laptop by Linux
Plusnet FTTC
|
|
|
I'm on W7 64bit with 3Gb of RAM on a SATA HDD. No issues when editing video. I do use an external HD to save the files as my bottleneck is the writing of the new file.
With your SSD and basic use then you shouldn't need any extra RAM.
The bottle-neck is normally the drive, it is the slowest thing on a computer, even SSD.
I only save compleated files onto the external drive or files for backup.
Adrian
Desktop machine now powered by windows 8.1 pro 64bit, no dreaded metro, laptop by Linux
Plusnet FTTC
|
|
|
Thanks for the replies, I very rarely have more than 3 programs open at a time. Photoshop Express does me for photo correction. I dont game so looks like the consensus is 4gb is adequate for my needs, thanks again for saving me £60-90.
I been trying to save myself money as well, I have been looking at laser printers, but I am not sure if I really need one, My ink jets works ok, but it was annoying me yesterday as I needed to print out a load of stuff in High quality and it takes so long. But would I really make use of a Laser printer?
Adrian
Desktop machine now powered by windows 8.1 pro 64bit, no dreaded metro, laptop by Linux
Plusnet FTTC
|
|
|
I bought my late Dad a Panasonic Laser, it lasted a good few years but eventually the drum needed replacing and it was as much as the printer so its now in the loft.
Lasers are handy for large print runs but I now stick to deskjets for the amount of printing I do like paypal receipts and the odd webpage. Could not justify a laser now.
|
|
|
I bought my late Dad a Panasonic Laser, it lasted a good few years but eventually the drum needed replacing and it was as much as the printer so its now in the loft.
Lasers are handy for large print runs but I now stick to deskjets for the amount of printing I do like paypal receipts and the odd webpage. Could not justify a laser now.
Most lasers these days have the drum built into the toner cartridge, so it is replaced with the toner. Also lasers have come down a lot in price, you can pick up a monochrome one for about £40, but it is basic. I am not bothered about wireless, my inkjet is wireless and I after it not working as it should I stuck it on USB and I have never used the wireless part since.
I did take a walk to Pc world yesterday and had a look, but they had very few lasers, most was inkjets, my Inkjet works fine, so I do not need a new one.
I am having the same problem with a router, I missed a good deal with a Asus router not so long ago because I could not make up my mind. I had a look at a TP link yesterday, but not sure about it, I was thinking of getting a all in one.
Adrian
Desktop machine now powered by windows 8.1 pro 64bit, no dreaded metro, laptop by Linux
Plusnet FTTC
|
|
|
I have a Samsung wireless laser. £39.99 from Staples last year. Also have an HP laserjet upstairs (20 years old now) and only required 1 toner in 10 years (at £25) Cheaper than injet by a long way.
Was Eclipse Home Option 1, VM 2Mb & O2 Standard
Now Utility Warehouse (up to 16mbps) via Talk Talk
|