I love Zen. Their service and reliability are second to none, but given how my usage profile is liable to change when I get FTTC its simply not going to be economical for me to stay. Zen is £38 per month for 200GB bandwidth and 13.49 each for two lines, a cost of £65 before calls. Plusnet would be £47.99 and their bandwidth is 'unlimited'; it drops to £37.99 for the first six months or £31.97 if I pay a year's line rental ahead.
Total saving over the first year is £336. Now I realise that Zen does not have the economy of scale of this competitor, and I also realise that Zen's service is second to none. I understand that these Plusnet are 'good enough' as regards service, and that while unlimited bandwidth probably means throttled or shaped bandwidth, I actually save the best part of a week's basic take-home pay over the first year. It's enough to buy a laptop!
While you do get what you pay for but I would love it if my favorite broadband provider was a BIT more competitive on pricing! It's a shame to part company
I'd highly recommend Sky. It is literally 24/7, no downtime, extremely low pings, cannot fault it.
I had to call service once, 2 years ago I believe, due to a congestion issue that appeared one day, suddenly. They informed me that in 3 days time, the exchange was being updated (faster links I presume, due to sky's populariity).
Sure enough, 3 days later, pings dropped back to the usual, and it's been like that ever since.
Really cannot fault the service. Used to be on Zen years ago, and the connection is every bit as reliable/robust.
Plus, it's so nice not having to even bother monitoring the amount of bandwidth you consume. On Zen, I'd get these emails every few hours, updating me that I'd used 50%, 60% of my allowance etc. Got quite frustrating in the end, hence the swap to Sky.
http://www.speedtest.net/result/2869262320.png
600M over good old Aluminium
600M over good old Aluminium



Pages in this thread:
Print Thread
dave2150