|
|
So you actually emailed them with the issue? Or you just assumed they were editorial input?
The chances of the people answering those email addresses knowing who to forward the email to are pretty high I would suggest, given a simple coherent email in the first place.
Sky is so large that I am guessing that the Sky broadband admin will be nothing to do with their Geo restrictions that apply to the news video streaming.
|
|
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
|
|
|
|
I agree, Sky broadband are a totally different entity to Sky TV.
|
|
|
When informed that 4 speed tests in a sig is excessive, adding another is not the sort of attitude we wish to see.
Reduce it to two.
|
|
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband moderator but it does not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
|
|
Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.
|
|
|
|
Post deleted by billford
|
|
|
Post deleted by billford
Edited by deleted (Fri 25-Jan-13 11:55:40)
|
|
|
No need.
Moderators have the right to ask you to change things like signatures if they think there are excessive.
You have been asked politely and can I suggest that a link to a page that has a bit of text to explain the context of the tests might be more useful, as at this time it is just random speedtests which to most people will mean nothing.
|
|
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
|
|
|
I have broke no forum rules so if you ahve an issue with the amont of TB speed test's in my sig, then please take it up with your boss Seb. Thank you.
I have left three in now anyway untill Seb changes the rules. The rules are inclusive, not exclusive: They are only guidelines that moderators use to ensure that our forums are an enjoyable place to be. We ultimately reserve the right to decide what is acceptable or not and working around the technicalities of rules may not be tolerated by moderators. I've given you a little time to think about it.
|
|
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband moderator but it does not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
|
|
|
It's easily found with Ctrl-F "precedent", but it's not just the one post - it's the whole conversation. It's rather pointless discussing the situation with someone whose only replying to the latest post, rather than having been involved in the whole thread.
http://forums.thinkbroadband.com/plusnet/t/4203501-r...
http://forums.thinkbroadband.com/plusnet/t/4203306-r... Well correct me if I am wrong but on a simple reading...
AOL supplied a non UK IP that was not acceptable to the BBC in the UK...so were responsible for the change.
Plusnet supplied a UK IP that should be acceptable to Sky other than the fact that Sky have blocked it in error.
How is it a precedent that an error by one ISP is the responsibility of a different ISP to correct? Not that they have any power to unblock it anyway other than inform Sky of their error..which they are doing I understand.
Even you aint that daft. 
|
|
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband moderator but it does not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
|
|
|
the fact that Sky have blocked it in error. How do you know that?
|
|
|
How do you know that?
It's in the thread... Touch�?
Edited by ferretuk (Fri 25-Jan-13 13:48:30)
|
Pages in this thread: 
Print Thread
deleted
