Also if the line was already ceased why would they charge me for another cease,
It a confusing issue prob only something the Plusnet rep can answer.
Ah
.
There is a difference between the number on a line being changed, which you expected, and the "cease" of phone service on the line immediately followed by a new provision of a telephone service on the line.
I think you've hit the nail on the head with that Rob! .... So the Lady from Plusnet mislead me into thinking Plusnet was still sort of connected. so her asking me for a cease charge of £25 to my connection was a complete lie.
so was the deception into agreeing for another 12 month contract was the only way out without penalties.
Which in theory I could of just left Plusnet broadband a freely to join any other provider if i wish to make that choice,
if i knew?
Please tell me if i'm wrong though coz i don't want a battering over it. lol
Oh dear. I'm afraid you have it wrong, partly probably because of two basic misunderstandings.
The first one is that nearly everybody and most ISPs refer to being "out of contract", when the end of the 12 or 18 months or whatever time it is, is reached. That isn't the case.
Such a contract is really a contract plus a declaration of a minimum term. At the end of the minimum term we are still in contract, usually a monthly one which can have a shorter period of notice. (PlusNet currently 10 days, about to become 14 days). You have always been in contract with Plusnet, just it was a monthly one.
The second and more important thing is, as I just said in a more general post, that I'm fairly sure that Plusnet did not cease your broadband because of the number change. Openreach automatically ceased it because BT ceased the phone line and ordered new one, rather than just changing the number as you expected. Plusnet weren't faced with a number change, they were faced with a broadband cease by Openreach, caused by BT Retail.
Plusnet get charged for the cease, (that's crazy, as I say in the other post), and realistically all they can do is charge the customer as the customer indirectly caused it. You were offered, in fact talked into, avoiding that charge by taking a new 12-month minimum term. "Forced" isn't really the word, but I agree your own circumstances effectively made it so.
Having said all that, your best hope is whatever you can negotiate with whichever PN rep you sent the PM to. Have they read it yet?
My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk |
Domains,website and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - Plusnet UnLim Fibre (FTTC). Sync ~ 51.8/16.8Mbps @ 600m. -
BQM
"Where talent is a dwarf, self-esteem is a giant." - Jean-Antoine Petit-Senn.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Allergy information: This post was manufactured in an environment where nuts are present. It may include traces of understatement, litotes and humour.