In reply to a post by AAuser27:

So do keep up.. I am talking before BT bought and ruined them.

Oh and just before BT bought them, Plusnet's traffic management policies were horrendous, they made them up as they went along infuriating many customers, myself included. If anything, BT rescued Plusnet from the gutter.

In reply to a post by AAuser27:

Not hard to keep up after you - you dunce

Oh, name calling, I guess you win the argument then.

In reply to a post by Oliver341:

In reply to a post by AAuser27:

So do keep up.. I am talking before BT bought and ruined them.

Oh and just before BT bought them, Plusnet's traffic management policies were horrendous, they made them up as they went along infuriating many customers, myself included. If anything, BT rescued Plusnet from the gutter.

I am aware of this - I took years of ear ache over it.

Post deleted by MrSaffron

In reply to a post by AAuser27:

hurts don't it

Actually it just makes you look foolish.

Post deleted by MrSaffron

In reply to a post by AAuser27:

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

Should we send him to Coventry for a fail like that?

No, as it wasn't a fail. Your stupid comment deserves it however.

Did you change usernames to avoid a ban, perchance?

In reply to a post by AAuser27:

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

Should we send him to Coventry for a fail like that?

No, but hey I have a few days free so if you feel like it Mr Spencer's house (you know the one he tries to hide on-line so he can shout his gob off and think he is safe) would be a much much better location. Only an hour from me too - lovely! (thanks T for the database access

I take it you are aware that making online threats can result in police action?

finell only went off to do some ironing !

In reply to a post by mlmclaren:

Well the stats aren't available as I pointed out above... and what conspiracy...

snip ...

The key stats are there by any reasonable interpretation. But now you're implying they could be inaccurate? Evidence? None.

Conspiracy? One user wrongly suggesting they had been removed showing Plusnet's decline, you implied the missing longest call time was suspicious even though long calls form part of the average. Now you're saying how can we trust the figures at all? That's not an argument you have a factual basis for or one I'm going to engage in.

I'm with Plusnet for the UK support, not absolute cost, otherwise I'd be with TalkTalk ...

You seem to be displaying a degree of discontent on these forums, and Plusnet's, that is not shared by any substantial part of Plusnet's 850,000 subscribers .... there are lots of other ISPs ...

Edited by Spud2003 (Tue 23-Jun-15 14:42:17)