In reply to a post by IanBB:

They're not allowed to contact you apart from telling you somebody is taking over the service and what you owe them!

Your comments on this forum rank alongside those of adslmax.

Unless he too was Cambridge educated then I am definitely not adslmax, I live no where near Telford (which is well documented as his town of residence) and my name is different to his. Can you not tell by my grammar and the way I put a sentence together? Even I struggle to understand his rants sometimes.

Thank you for the information. I have made an extra payment to cover the amount I owe anyway.

Also I am only posting on this occasion because of the ruthless blocking they have started to do in the stupid name of Football, adslmax complains about everything, from the price to the speed to the direction the wind is blowing at the time of his internet usage.

I don't have time for any of that. I am very happy with my ISP's in general.

Edited by deleted (Sat 17-Mar-18 18:46:09)

What blocking?

Is nowhere 2 words in Cambridge?

In reply to a post by 23Prince:

because of the ruthless blocking

Whats that? Do you have a link?

In reply to a post by IanBB:

Is nowhere 2 words in Cambridge?

No it's one word. What Swiftkey decides to do is it's own doing. My point was I am not adslmax, no need to get petty over it

In reply to a post by jchamier:

In reply to a post by 23Prince:

because of the ruthless blocking

Whats that? Do you have a link?

Do you want me to link to EVERY high court order which they have to act on? To me that is ruthless blocking as many legal sites have also fell foul to ISP's getting it wrong. So I want an ISP who does not block anything - and is dead set against it. Hence my switch to AAISP

90% of IPTV services, legal or not - get blocked by the ISP's when there are premier league football matches on, again another court order. It's funny how for us it's when NowTV and IPTV has trouble. Fine the rest of the time.

NOTE: If an ISP is served with a court order and refuses to act it will find itself in court.

Interested in hearing more on which legal TV services are blocked by court order.

As for NOWTV don't see how that fits in, unless you are suggesting there are court orders in place blocking some shows? Which is very different to a rights holder saying something is not allowed to be available via catch-up, but can go out as live.

In reply to a post by 23Prince:

No it's one word. What Swiftkey decides to do is it's own doing. My point was I am not adslmax, no need to get petty over it

You're the one claiming a Cambridge education but make a grammatical error in the next sentence.

The comparison stands, you're as believable as adslmax.

In reply to a post by IanBB:

In reply to a post by 23Prince:

No it's one word. What Swiftkey decides to do is it's own doing. My point was I am not adslmax, no need to get petty over it

You're the one claiming a Cambridge education but make a grammatical error in the next sentence.

The comparison stands, you're as believable as adslmax.

Not even going to bother to reply to that