FTTC STATS :: AAISP :: think broadband

User comments on ISPs
>> AAISP

These posts have been archived and can no longer be replied to or modified.
Pages in this thread: 1 \| [2] \| (show all)	Print Thread

deleted
(deleted) Fri 27-Nov-09 13:12:37

Re: FTTC STATS

[re: bookey] [link to this post]

Thanks for the bump. I will get back to you in a bit.

FatPipeJunky
(experienced) Wed 02-Dec-09 10:45:35

Re: FTTC STATS

[re: deleted] [link to this post]

Getting about 35Mbit throughput on a 40Mbit sync seems about right to me given roughly 15% TCP/IP overheads.

<n>ildram DSL2000 > entanet> BE*

deleted
(deleted) Wed 02-Dec-09 12:35:22

Re: FTTC STATS

[re: FatPipeJunky] [link to this post]

In reply to a post by FatPipeJunky:
Getting about 35Mbit throughput on a 40Mbit sync seems about right to me given roughly 15% TCP/IP overheads.

I gathered from previous posts that 35Mbit was a limit imposed by BTs stupid profiling system?

FatPipeJunky
(experienced) Wed 02-Dec-09 12:57:06

Re: FTTC STATS

[re: deleted] [link to this post]

Yes it is, but if it were an LLU product with no such profiling system you wouldn't see over 35Mbit throughput anyway as roughly 5Mbit is being used for TCP/IP overheads.
It's much in the same way that on the 8Mbit DSL circuits BT has a maximum profile of 7150Kbit on an 8128Kbit line as 7150 is just 8128 less about 17% TCP/IP overheads.

<n>ildram DSL2000 > entanet> BE*

Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | (show all)

Print Thread

Jump to