User comments on ISPs
  >> AAISP


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: << 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | [17] | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User gorebrush
(regular) Thu 23-May-24 20:16:09
Print Post

Re: Poor uptime and reliability


[re: Chrysalis] [link to this post]
 
Week 2 April here and it's been 100% other than when I've been faffing internally.
Standard User Chrysalis
(legend) Fri 24-May-24 16:34:42
Print Post

Re: Poor uptime and reliability


[re: gorebrush] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by gorebrush:
Week 2 April here and it's been 100% other than when I've been faffing internally.


Yeah my CQM I expect doesnt look great since circuit installed, but lots of work on my equipment, and some outages from national grid work also (I have moved ONT to UPS power now though since earlier this week). Not noticed any outages ISP side yet.

Edited by Chrysalis (Fri 24-May-24 16:35:30)

Standard User candlerb
(knowledge is power) Fri 24-May-24 17:12:50
Print Post

Re: Poor uptime and reliability


[re: Chrysalis] [link to this post]
 
Update on the status page:

Our LNSs remain stable running the 'Factory' software. Work continues in our test lab and on non-customer affecting parts of our network to track down the problem with the alpha software.

For the past month or so our service has no incident of LNS hangs, most of our FB9000 LNSs have an uptime approaching 100 days. We are confident that the Factory software is stable.

Interesting that it was "alpha" software that was causing the problems. But good that the released software is stable.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User Pipexer
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Fri 24-May-24 21:43:25
Print Post

Re: Poor uptime and reliability


[re: candlerb] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by candlerb:
Update on the status page:

Our LNSs remain stable running the 'Factory' software. Work continues in our test lab and on non-customer affecting parts of our network to track down the problem with the alpha software.

For the past month or so our service has no incident of LNS hangs, most of our FB9000 LNSs have an uptime approaching 100 days. We are confident that the Factory software is stable.

Interesting that it was "alpha" software that was causing the problems. But good that the released software is stable.

Seeing as they develop the software themselves I wouldn't read too much into their nomenclature of calling it "alpha". It wouldn't have been in their interests to knowingly put buggy software into production. It probably was thought of as stable and about to make it to that as such, but then the problems happened so it never quite ever got out of the stage of officially being "alpha".

Andrews & Arnold Home ::1 on Draytek 2862ac - Why settle for inferior?
Standard User candlerb
(knowledge is power) Sat 25-May-24 09:00:32
Print Post

Re: Poor uptime and reliability


[re: Pipexer] [link to this post]
 
I do wonder though, what shiny new features were so important in this new software that (a) they put it straight into production, and (b) they persisted with trying to fix it *in production* for months, rather than rolling back to the stable software straight away.

The positive from this is that the existence of software which is stable under the same load strongly suggests that it's *not* flaky hardware after all. Not 100%, but very likely.
Standard User E300
(committed) Sat 25-May-24 09:44:10
Print Post

Re: Poor uptime and reliability


[re: candlerb] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by candlerb:
I do wonder though, what shiny new features were so important in this new software that (a) they put it straight into production, and (b) they persisted with trying to fix it *in production* for months, rather than rolling back to the stable software straight away.

The positive from this is that the existence of software which is stable under the same load strongly suggests that it's *not* flaky hardware after all. Not 100%, but very likely.


I'm assuming they've gone back to the original Firebrick OS that only runs on 2 cores and the OS they need to get working is the complete rewrite that allows the new Firebrick to run using all the cores. This would explain why they can't just compare the code differences between the working one and the one that crashes, as they can't be compared. This might also explain why they needed to throw up more of the new Firebricks as they would be under-performing.

All conjecture on my part of course, but if you read this blog https://www.firebrick.co.uk/about/news/version-20/ the dates of the new version 2.0 OS going live coincided with the all the problems starting, and prior to the OS 2.0, the new Firebricks were stable when running on the original older software utilising only 2 cores.

Edited by E300 (Sat 25-May-24 09:50:00)

Standard User jaydub
(fountain of knowledge) Fri 31-May-24 10:26:21
Print Post

Re: Poor uptime and reliability


[re: candlerb] [link to this post]
 
We had a very short outage at 23:40 last night. It's the first time since they reverted to the stable firmware. Anyone else have any similar issues?
Standard User bellerby
(newbie) Fri 31-May-24 11:03:03
Print Post

Re: Poor uptime and reliability


[re: jaydub] [link to this post]
 
I also had an outage last night between 23:41 and 23:49, during which time my router actually received a WAN address in the 10.93 range - and I'm now with Zen via BTW! I put it down to a BTW issue.
Standard User candlerb
(knowledge is power) Fri 31-May-24 11:52:44
Print Post

Re: Poor uptime and reliability


[re: E300] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by E300:
I'm assuming they've gone back to the original Firebrick OS that only runs on 2 cores and the OS they need to get working is the complete rewrite that allows the new Firebrick to run using all the cores.

Ha - "complete rewrite". Microtik did that for RouterOS v6 -> v7, and some three years later the "stable" train still is in complete flux and there's no "long-term" version at all.
Standard User Chrysalis
(legend) Fri 31-May-24 23:21:48
Print Post

Re: Poor uptime and reliability


[re: bellerby] [link to this post]
 
Yeah it looks like it wasnt AAISP wide, no outage here (via cityfibre).

Pages in this thread: << 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | [17] | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to