This link will give you some information on "n".

http://reviews.zdnet.co.uk/hardware/networking/0,1000000696,39284717,00.htm

Theoretically you could get 540Mbps but as for the speed of the HHv2 no idea.

TLMC

This is the best info I can find,

http://www.jarviser.co.uk/jarviser/hubv2wifitest.html

ty all..

I have come across somthing very odd...

I have the HH set to use 802.11b/g/n and got a wireless n card in my bro's pc but it will connect at 78Mb most of the time but actuall toughput is only 1-2mb on speedtests... so i set the HH to b/g only and now its conected at the full 54mb and speedtests are as they should be at just under 7000Kbps.

So whats going on there? i thought the 802.11n has better speeds and coverage than 802.11a/b/g??

i think 802.11n have some major problems,. it is still in draft by the way.

A mate have a Belkin 802.11n and it knocks out all vodafones in the house if the router channel is set to manual.
If I try to connect the wireless part of my mobile phone to it, the router resets.

I know someone else who have a cisco 802.11n and that is useless, took ages to get it to connect, change it to 802.11g and it works ok.

We never got on too well with 802.11n here ended up going back to g as some devices just couldn't connect whatever and there was no difference in the max distance the signal could cover that we noticed.

130mbps is the highest speed the HH 2 can support via wireless. Wireless for me is a mixed bag really, I tried connecting my iMac using it and notice slow downs in connection speed and such. Pop back in the ethernet cable and all these problems have gone away. It's good for a laptop though :-)