Currently I plan to jump ship during the summer. At which point I will have to pay off approx 6 months.
Deciding to either go for true quality and static ip someone like zen but high cost and no unmetered use.
Or escape BT wholesale and go with sky who seem to know what they doing better with capacity, have easynet peering and although not static ip they do have dhcp auth meaning ip's will stick between ppp resets.
BT is still night and day over VM os this isnt urgent for me, but been blunt i think I only went with infinity to get a fast install (was only checker saying yes at time) and I knew if issues the CEO would only help me if I was a BT retail customer.
Regarding plusnet to me it looks very different. The graphs for their issue was huge spikes of latency, not packetloss. Also different time frames, and different dates. Dont assume just because another isp has a slowdown issue or something similiar reported its the same thing. Plus plusnet staff confirmed their issue was on the plusnet equipment.
http://www.plus.net/supportpages.html?a=2&support_ac...
and their forums where graphs got posted and comments from staff made.
Also I agree with your reply to mrsaffron, if they were willing to uncap p2p they should have also been willing to provide enough capacity, if not p2p should have stayed capped. I didnt want to join another VM where they just under supply and leave everyone to fight for resources.
Finally your comment on the trial is interesting as the BT forum also has complaints of slow speeds which apparently started in dec 2012.
BT Infinity 2 Since Dec 2012 - Estimate 65.9/20 - Attainable peak 110/36 - Current Sync 71/20
Edited by Chrysalis (Thu 07-Mar-13 23:45:39)



Pages in this thread:
Print Thread
Chrysalis