Technical Discussion
  >> DSL Hardware Discussion


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


These posts have been archived and can no longer be replied to or modified.
  Print Thread
Standard User philipwarden
(newbie) Thu 15-Jun-06 15:03:38
Print Post

replacement for BT 2-wire 1250


[link to this post]
 
I wonder if I could trouble you for some help. The BT 1250 2-wire home network has worked well for me for a few years now until I recently moved to a much larger home in the country.

The new home has solid walls and the distance from the router to the two pc's that I wish to be connected is about 30m. This seems to be too far for the BT1250.

Please can someone recommend an alternative as it seems that I am going to have to purchase new wireless equipment to cope with the larger house and the increased range.

Many thanks

Philip
Standard User yarwell
(legend) Thu 15-Jun-06 15:16:26
Print Post

Re: replacement for BT 2-wire 1250


[re: philipwarden] [link to this post]
 
the wi-fi standards limit the output power so unless you have good evidence to the contrary I would not assume that any 802.11 device will do better than any other.

Phil

Griffin MaxDSL Premium - Day 1 4960/690 then Day 10
Anonymous
(Unregistered)Mon 19-Jun-06 10:21:59
Print Post

Re: replacement for BT 2-wire 1250


[re: yarwell] [link to this post]
 
Thanks very much for your reply. The BT router used to function well in a flat. It appears to have lost power though and I can not check whether it is functioning correctly. I suspect it is not. If all wifi routers have the same power I wonder what the solution is. Are there boosters available to repeat or boost the signal. Cabling is not an option sadly.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User hunnymonster
(member) Mon 19-Jun-06 10:32:56
Print Post

Re: replacement for BT 2-wire 1250


[re: yarwell] [link to this post]
 
My own experience is that some wireless access points and routers are noticeably worse than others - particularly in signal strength - all down to the antenna design I guess.

Measuring the signal level in a totally non-scientific way, using the signal level reported by the WLAN card in the laptop, I've seen variances of up to 10dB depending on the wireless basestation in use (basestation placed in the same place, laptop in the same place).

So if the max is considered 0dB and the user has equipment now that is performing at -6dB then upon replacing it with one of the good performers they'll see an apparent 6dB rise in signal and hopefully that should translate into wider coverage.



<n>ildram BroadbandMax (working just fine most of the time)
  Print Thread

Jump to