In reply to a post by billford:

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

But I think you'll agree, he's not a newbie

On the evidence available to me- no, I wouldn't agree with that.

Fairy nuff. Let's see if he gets past 2

Why ignore what he said though?

Edited by deleted (Sun 12-Jun-11 15:32:16)

Because it's a troll post by a newbie.

If you say so.

IMO obviously. You did ask...

This sub-thread is way off topic and performing no useful function any more.

Closed.

Edited by billford (Sun 12-Jun-11 16:08:27)

In reply to a post by billford:

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

Because it's a troll post by a newbie.

You were a newbie once...

and I will be again, no doubt.

I'm just wondering about your motivation for labelling him a such. nm.

I'm shutting shop on this out respect to the OP. He can try again if he still retains the will to live.

Most of the technical stuff goes over my head but but I certainly take exception to a new member being accused of using a false username without any basis other than it was a first post that I can see, and it dared to challenge the views of a fellow member, what cheek!

Batboy, if you can substantiate that accusation.... do so, so.... Put up or Shut Up!. As I know you cannot put up option two is the one to go for. I think it shows that when you cannot win an argument you try to divert it to a personal attack.....not a very noble trait I'm afraid.

Your assertion that the post in question, which was polite, and well argued and very much to the point was a troll post has an incredible irony that I think most members will see, what is that in your sig about attacking the post and not the poster?...... made my day anyway.