General Discussion
  >> Fibre Broadband


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | [3] | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User Zarjaz
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Mon 07-Oct-19 20:08:43
Print Post

Re: aggregation nodes


[re: j0hn83] [link to this post]
 
Me too John, and having 4 lanes just seems to confuse them further.

Standard User RobertoS
(elder) Tue 08-Oct-19 00:47:55
Print Post

Re: aggregation nodes


[re: Zarjaz] [link to this post]
 
The main danger is a breakdown or an accident, plus an hugely increased risk of a breakdown causing an accident. Emergency vehicles not able to get to the scene either.

But we aren't really in the right place for this discussion. I was merely trying initially to point out that decisions made about solving capacity problems by using and thereby removing the deliberately engineered in safety margin are rarely wise.

My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk. Domains, site and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - Three 4G, tbb tests normally 35-45Mpbs down, 65Mbps off-peak, 9-24 up.
==================================================
If you never think of anything off the wall, you'll never think of anything original.
Standard User ian72
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Tue 08-Oct-19 10:06:37
Print Post

Re: aggregation nodes


[re: Zarjaz] [link to this post]
 
It is incredibly difficult to sit in the middle lane of a 4 lane motorway - there must be drivers that have a mental breakdown when confronted with such an issue...


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User jabuzzard
(committed) Tue 08-Oct-19 10:55:20
Print Post

Re: aggregation nodes


[re: j0hn83] [link to this post]
 
That was my take too. Though the number of premises that are two far from the OLT to get GPON must be very low. I would suspect well less that 1% are going to be those tricky deep rural properties several miles up a glen somewhere in Scotland. There was some talk earlier that using lower split ratios (as low as 1:4) gets a longer distance from the OLT to begin with anyway.

That said for this small number of premises involved I would be tempted either to go fully PtP because standard 1Gbps BiDi optics can be had at 120km for under £100 a pair and gives you a fully symmetric connection.

The other option would be to go with the emerging CWDM-PON standard which only requires split rations of 1:9 or less and for which 120km SFP's can be had for even less, though you would need CWDM-PON splitters and again this is a fully symmetric system.

Both of these alternative options are also good for symmetric speeds of 10Gbps and 25Gbps today so very future proof.
Standard User Zarjaz
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Tue 08-Oct-19 12:14:59
Print Post

Re: aggregation nodes


[re: ian72] [link to this post]
 
Nah, they just believe that the centre lane has been widened to a dual carriageway.

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 09-Oct-19 11:38:38
Print Post

Re: aggregation nodes


[re: Taras] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Taras:
In reply to a post by RobertoS:
Like hard shoulders on the now far more dangerous �smart� motorways.


the idea of smart motorways isn't a bad one, but joe public having to guess what it all means. Smart motorways can create hard shoulders ad-hoc and also on the right hand side too.


Doesn't that rely on people actually reading and complying with the gantry signs? Something that rarely happens in my experience until people actually see the obstruction and try to rapidly change lanes.

Sorry, way off topic now.
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | [3] | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to