6th July
Not missed.
I first reported, "at least one of the cabs in the valley has two pods fitted they are both of a slightly different design, the left a surface door on the outside with extra vents, ( pod as in the street view the another cab ) as against the right one where the whole panel opens with small vents."
Very interesting chat to two MJ Quinn engineers in front of this open cab.
https://tinyurl.com/68a5y4r2
Turned out to be a tutor and apprentice.
The right pod contains a G.fast Dslam.
The left pod contains punch downs multi core connected directly to the other pod.
Why is the left pod vented unlike the main cab.
New PCP's punch downs will now all be vented.
Why do they not put G.fast pods onto Vdsl cabs.
As the G.fast range is limited to those ideally under 300 meters of copper, the pod on the Vdsl would be subject to two additional lengths of the link cable between it and the PCP, which could be up to 50 meters away, thus excluding some potential users.
He thought that BT/OR has underestimated the amount of take-up there would be.
I think it might have been TBB news who reported that a large number of G-fast users had opted for less than max speeds.
Can't find a search option there so can't confirm.
It might have been kitz.
Thanks to all contributors for learned views.
Open Small G-fast pod here.
https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2019/09/openre...